Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\.\:\s+500w\s+Amplifier\s+With\s+IRF510\'s\s+\-\s+Schematic\s+updated\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re.: 500w Amplifier With IRF510's - Schematic updated (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF]" <oz1pif@privat.dk>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:23:27 +0200
Some errors in the schematic corrected.. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00151.html (7,185 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Re.: 500w Amplifier With IRF510's - Schematic updated (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:29:13 +0100
A suggestion for anyone planning to copy this - get 8 fets from one batch, so the gate thresholds are likely to be close together. IR specify a range of 2-4V so a mix could end up with only some bein
/archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00157.html (7,420 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Re.: 500w Amplifier With IRF510's - Schematic updated (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF]" <oz1pif@privat.dk>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:10:10 +0200
I can only support Steve in this, although all I have tested have been within 0.1V of each other (from three different batches) Vy 73 de OZ1PIF, Peter ** OZ1PIF ** email: oz1pif(no-spam-filler)@priva
/archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00158.html (9,663 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Re.: 500w Amplifier With IRF510's - Schematic updated (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:45:41 +0100
I should have said there's the alternative to measure them instead. Perhaps they were all from the same wafer run, but packaged at different times, or maybe the process control is easier than with rf
/archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00160.html (7,881 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu