Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\s+Henry\s+2KD2\s+Amplifier\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Re\s+Henry\s+2KD2\s+Amplifier\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Fern" <crc@cyberlink.bc.ca>; Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:01:12 -0700; G'day Fern: Those would be the Lost Souls, who wander the Earth uninformed and unfulfilled. They should be pitied and directed back onto the Path of Righteousness. There is a good use for 10-80 meter; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00045.html (8,629 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: N7KA@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:33:01 +0000 (UTC); Lets keep the 80-10M amps alive and working well. I want users of those amps to use THEM as designed, on 80-10M. You ask why? Many folks operate from small locations on 80-10M. Just imagine all the; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00046.html (8,595 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 04:03:01 +0000; I have heard that 160 is the "Gentlemans Band" now for many years. However, after getting back on 160 (after a 24 year hiatus), I must say it sounds more like 20 Meters, especially when something "ra; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00047.html (9,886 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:59:50 -0500; I don't remember it being otherwise even when we only had 25 KHz plus at the bottom of the band back in the 70's. When the band opened so did the DX window<:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) ______________________; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00048.html (7,887 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:07:03 -0500; The best thing about 160 is that most do not have the room for an effective antenna and their weak signals are little bother. It is my favorite of the MF-HF bands. OTOH, 75 is little more than a CB s; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00050.html (10,289 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:12:00 -0500; The only way to work 160M DX is on CW and with a reasonably competent DX operator. Then skill actually counts. On SSB I doubt if half the maniacs screaming can even hear the DX since they are listeni; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00051.html (9,380 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:22:38 -0500; Yes. Last night I came on a new one for me on 160 CW & there was one person calling & the DX didn't hear him. After waiting maybe 10 tries for this 1x2 to make contact I gave my call & some fatuous n; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00052.html (9,944 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1): Author: JTB τΏτ <jerryjtb@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:30:03 -0500; Welcome to drive by Ham Testing. W0ZD Yes. Last night I came on a new one for me on 160 CW & there was one person calling & the DX didn't hear him. After waiting maybe 10 tries for this 1x2 to make c; /archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00057.html (10,804 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]