Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Rebuilding\s+oxide\s+cathode\s+tubes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Rebuilding\s+oxide\s+cathode\s+tubes\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Rebuilding oxide cathode tubes (score: 1): Author: "John Lyles" <jtml@losalamos.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:19:24 -0600; I believe the answer is that thoriated tungsten filaments are much easier to copy and replace, than oxide cathodes. Its my impression that calcium, barium, strontium oxide chemistry is somewhat propr; /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00064.html (10,544 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Rebuilding oxide cathode tubes (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:50:02 -0400; Thanks for that info John. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2010-07/msg00068.html (11,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]