Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-1000\s+Transformer\s+\&\s+Problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-1000\s+Transformer\s+\&\s+Problem\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB-1000 Transformer & Problem (score: 1): Author: kb9cry at attbi.com (Phil - KB9CRY); Date: Mon Mar 10 14:26:01 2003; I've got a question. I acquired a SB-1000 that has a Heathkit transformer with the part number of 54-1063. The manual lists the part number required as 54-1061. Is there any difference? Also, I've me; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00434.html (7,394 bytes)
2. [Amps] SB-1000 Transformer & Problem (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon Mar 10 14:41:00 2003; When the SB1000 was produced, some changes were made from the original design. The original transformers were bought from Schumacher, and were better transformers. Later transformers had a tendency; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00436.html (7,651 bytes)
3. [Amps] SB-1000 Transformer & Problem (score: 1): Author: w8cqjeff at tds.net (Jeff Weinberg W8CQ); Date: Mon Mar 10 14:43:59 2003; Hi Phil, That transformer you have is the export model transformer, thus all of the voltages are a higher than with the original US domestic transformer. As far as the fuse blowing, it is probably a; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00437.html (8,694 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]