Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+SB\-220\s+parasitic\s+suppressors\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:04:20 -0800
One reason that an SB-220 can develop VHF parasitics is the following: the original suppressors use 2-watt carbon composition resistors. These resistors tend to increase in value when they age, and e
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00048.html (6,730 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Clements" <philk5pc@tyler.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:50:23 -0600
One reason that an SB-220 can develop VHF parasitics is the following: the original suppressors use 2-watt carbon composition resistors. These resistors tend to increase in value when they age, and
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00049.html (8,400 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "K7RDX" <k7rdx@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:02:39 -0800
Vic is absolutely correct about resistors changing value due to heat/age/mistuning,etc. Another way to tame especially squirrly amps is to add a supressor to the cathode side in addition to the usual
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00050.html (8,808 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:56:37 -0800
On Nov 3, 2004, at 2:04 PM, Vic Rosenthal wrote: One reason that an SB-220 can develop VHF parasitics is the following: the original suppressors use 2-watt carbon composition resistors. These resisto
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00056.html (8,226 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 22:21:23 -0800
On Nov 3, 2004, at 4:02 PM, K7RDX wrote: Vic is absolutely correct about resistors changing value due to heat/age/mistuning,etc. Another way to tame especially squirrly amps is to add a supressor to
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00058.html (10,934 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Tony King <amps@w4zt.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 01:43:02 -0500
At 01:21 AM 11/4/2004, R.Measures wrote: <snip> A GS-35b has 0.12pF of anode-cathode feedback C. An 8877 has 0.10pF of it, so they have a fairly similar amount of internal feedback. Our 8877 low VHF-
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00059.html (8,102 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "K7RDX" <k7rdx@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 23:11:55 -0800
OK...Strange a fellow would order your kit if he couldn`t solder the "Thing" in place.Jim. -- Original Message -- From: "R.Measures" <r@somis.org> To: "K7RDX" <k7rdx@earthlink.net> Cc: "Amps reflecto
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00061.html (11,921 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 02:41:59 EST
-- Today's trivia question: At its max freq of 1000MHz, what is the -j1326 OHMS Dennis O. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00062.html (7,430 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:15:05 -0000
Feedback C on the data sheet is almost certainly measured at low frequency. The feedback characteristics at V/UHF might be different. By now there's lots of amps out there using the Russian planar tr
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00063.html (9,012 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:23:55 +0000
K7RDX wrote: My hf GS-35b AMP has a supressor only in the cathode and has been super stable for the last four years..... GS-35B amps on 432MHz, 144Mhz and 50MHz are unconditionally stable with NO par
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00064.html (9,428 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:08:15 -0800
On Nov 4, 2004, at 12:23 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote: K7RDX wrote: My hf GS-35b AMP has a supressor only in the cathode and has been super stable for the last four years..... GS-35B amps on 432MHz, 14
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00065.html (12,193 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:18:34 -0800
On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:43 PM, Tony King wrote: At 01:21 AM 11/4/2004, R.Measures wrote: <snip> A GS-35b has 0.12pF of anode-cathode feedback C. An 8877 has 0.10pF of it, so they have a fairly similar
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00066.html (9,905 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:25:26 -0800
On Nov 3, 2004, at 11:11 PM, K7RDX wrote: OK...Strange a fellow would order your kit if he couldn`t solder the "Thing" in place.Jim. He thought it was a bolt-on kit. -- Original Message -- From: "R.M
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00068.html (13,506 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:26:32 -0800
Correct On Nov 3, 2004, at 11:41 PM, Dennis12Amplify@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 11/4/04 1:10:35 AM Central Standard Time, k7rdx@earthlink.net writes: -- Today's trivia question: At its max fre
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00069.html (8,679 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 06:29:08 -0800
On Nov 4, 2004, at 12:15 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: Tony King wrote: At 01:21 AM 11/4/2004, R.Measures wrote: <snip> A GS-35b has 0.12pF of anode-cathode feedback C. An 8877 has 0.10pF of it, so they
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00070.html (9,955 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:10:48 +0000
The dielectric won't alter, but the impedances probably will. Steve _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00071.html (9,798 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 19:47:46 +0000
R. Measures wrote: On Nov 4, 2004, at 12:23 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote: K7RDX wrote: My hf GS-35b AMP has a supressor only in the cathode and has been super stable for the last four years..... GS-35B
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00080.html (14,548 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:01:12 -0800
On Nov 4, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote: R. Measures wrote: On Nov 4, 2004, at 12:23 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote: K7RDX wrote: My hf GS-35b AMP has a supressor only in the cathode and has
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00084.html (16,266 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Tony King <amps@w4zt.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:47:36 -0500
At 02:47 PM 11/4/2004, Ian White, G3SEK, wrote: <snip> Neither of those responses addresses my point: if VHF amplifiers using these tubes are stable under worst-case conditions, where the input and o
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00088.html (11,478 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:54:11 -0500
for the VHF energy produced thereby to reach the load. Man I was waiting one somebody to finally say that =) Will Matney _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contes
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00091.html (8,879 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu