- 1. [Amps] SPAM (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:02:51 +0200 (CEST)
- Are you guys starting to gets lots of spam suggestive that the AMPS or Towertalk reflectors have been 'harvested'? 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amp
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00128.html (7,015 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] SPAM (score: 1)
- Author: "William Stehl" <wastehl@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:05:42 -0700
- Nothing here... 73's Bill _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00129.html (7,603 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] SPAM (score: 1)
- Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:07:52 -0400
- Peter, Nope, sure haven't. Just the posts from the reflector. Best, Will ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** On 9/6/06 at 11:02 PM Peter Chadwick wrote: _______________________________________________ Amps mailing
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00130.html (7,529 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] SPAM (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:19:01 -0500
- Not getting any more spam than usual lately. It always seems to be about equal in volume to regular email. 73, Keith NM5G Are you guys starting to gets lots of spam suggestive that the AMPS or Towert
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00131.html (7,133 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] SPAM (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:02:33 -0400
- Don't know if it is related but for some reason amps is coming in on an email address I haven't subscribed to "amps" on. That's pretty weird. It just started doing that today. 73 Tom _______________
- /archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00133.html (7,212 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu