Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Shock\s+hazard\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Shock\s+hazard\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:26:54 -0500; I know this don't necessarily have to do with amps, but I figured I'd show this as what not to do in building any tube application. Can anyone spot the shock hazard on the old CD capacitor checker? I; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00177.html (7,193 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:34:36 -0800; The only thing I can think to say is "we've came a long way baby." 3's and such, Gary WA6FGI snip I know this don't necessarily have to do with amps, but I figured I'd show this as what not to do in; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00178.html (7,973 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Bruno - K2KI" <k2ki@starc.org>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:44:27 -0500; I see that very inviting to the touch plate cap on the tube... Hmmm. I wonder what would happen if I touched that little metal thingy on top of that glass thingy while this thing is plugged in and tu; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00180.html (8,222 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:50:18 -0500; Dear Will, Let's see, the a.c. cord is probably not polarized, so that means the chassis can either be hot or neutral, depending upon the insertion..... Nevertheless, I wouldn't want to touch the cha; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00185.html (7,100 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: Arthur Moe <kb7ww@easystreet.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 21:07:48 +0000; Will and all, If your referring to the "CAP" connection on top of the tube you do NOT need to worry it is not the plate it is the grid. Typical Operation of the grid -13.5 volts. 12A7 http://hereford; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00186.html (8,232 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:18:21 -0500; Arthur, Your correct. I thought that was the anode cap on a rectifier tube. I couldn't figure why in the world they would have done that. Next time I'll look up the tube but figured it a diode. Still; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00187.html (9,645 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: Tony King <amps@w4zt.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 19:53:36 -0500; At 03:50 PM 11/12/2004, Harold B. Mandel wrote: Dear Will, Let's see, the a.c. cord is probably not polarized, so that means the chassis can either be hot or neutral, depending upon the insertion....; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00193.html (7,856 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 21:08:27 -0500; Speaking of transformers, I'm always looking for new-old books on them, and found one of interest to several on here. The title of the book is "Electronic Transformers And Circuits", 2nd edition. It; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00194.html (10,640 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:24:33 -0500; There's a composition resistor between the line cord and chassis ground. This is a common configuration of several years ago, especially found in 5-tube radios. ______________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00195.html (8,614 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: Tony King <amps@w4zt.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:48:56 -0500; ohhh... I didn't see that in the picture. Where is it? zt At 11:24 PM 11/12/2004, Harold B. Mandel wrote: There's a composition resistor between the line cord and chassis ground. This is a common con; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00196.html (8,678 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1): Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:10:10 EST; Since the line cord in the picture was obviously recently replaced anyway; why didn't they just replace it with a 3-wire cord? Dennis O. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing l; /archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00218.html (7,738 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]