Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Some\s+thoughts\s+on\s+a\s+transistorized\s+legal\s+limit\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Some\s+thoughts\s+on\s+a\s+transistorized\s+legal\s+limit\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Some thoughts on a transistorized legal limit (score: 1): Author: kg7hf@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:59:11 +0000; Hi Marv, When I saw your post, I also thought of using class E as well, since you have to restore anyway. More efficiency = smaller heatsinks, smaller powersupply, less expensive parts. But my guess; /archives//html/Amps/2007-10/msg00184.html (10,330 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Some thoughts on a transistorized legal limit (score: 1): Author: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:11:01 -0700 (PDT); Hi Paul, The amp section is 25 cents/watt per APT -- $250 The power supply will run about $100 in parts. The Pi-nets might run a couple hundred in today's depreciated dollars. The cabinet, heatsink(s; /archives//html/Amps/2007-10/msg00203.html (8,102 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]