Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Spam\s+from\s+Members\s+of\s+this\s+List\s+\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Spam\s+from\s+Members\s+of\s+this\s+List\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:42:19 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Correct, and I admit I am guilty of this too. One way around this is to use Yahoo groups. By default, the message is sent ONLY to the group and not to individu; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00353.html (10,169 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: "Larry Carman" <lncarman@swbell.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:56:50 -0500; I have to agree with WA4TT. We'd all like to pass the buck and not take the responsibility due us. I'm a programmer and have several servers I'm the administrator of. Stopping spam is no small matter; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00359.html (9,751 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: mike kendall <ke6cvh@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT); OK, Now the subject/thread has changed to replying to people directly in the group during an on going discussion. Example: I know that when I was responding to the thread on Ameritron there was sever; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00367.html (14,960 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: mike kendall <ke6cvh@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:56:47 -0700 (PDT); OK, Now the subject/thread has changed to replying to people directly in the group during an on going discussion. Example: I know that when I was responding to the thread on Ameritron there was sever; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00368.html (15,115 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:25:17 -0400; Mike, I get these same multiple e-mails (posts) all the time, one from the list, one from the sender. Some discussed this a while back, but was not over the same subject. I think it was over some bei; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00375.html (15,184 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:58:06 -0500; One of my pet peeves is getting a post that is full of prior comments with attribution marks, but with no new comments from the last sender. It's just an edited recap of what several guys said in ea; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00379.html (9,896 bytes)
27. [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: "Administrator" <amps@myrealbox.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:04:28 -0400; There are two sets of archives for Amps and *all* of the other lists at contesting.com. One is the "standard" downloadable archives: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/amps/ the other set of archi; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00384.html (7,533 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ... (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:09:47 -0400; It would be best if the software could strip the whole header, with any e-mail address, out of the mail before it posts it to the archive. A harvester looks for any text string with an @ in it accord; /archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00391.html (10,104 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]