Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Stainless\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Stainless\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Stainless (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat Mar 1 07:26:12 2003; The fact stainless is "magnetic" or not isn't important at radio frequencies. Eddy currents and skin effect keep the magnetic properties out of the picture. If you add a solid steel slug core in a co; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00002.html (7,277 bytes)
2. [Amps] Stainless (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Sat Mar 1 10:19:03 2003; He's back. "Slightly more"? Compared to Cu-Zn / brass alloys, Fe-Cr-Ni-Si ... /stainless steel alloys have 20 - 40 times as much DC resistance per cubic cm. Good point - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00006.html (7,758 bytes)
3. [Amps] Stainless (score: 1): Author: jtml at lanl.gov (John T. M. Lyles); Date: Fri Feb 28 12:13:45 2003; Non-magnetic stainless steel alloys will work. Some are magnetic, as can be tested with a small magnet. These are the higher loss stainless steels, in which eddy current heating can be expected. Bras; /archives//html/Amps/2003-02/msg00513.html (6,712 bytes)
4. [Amps] Stainless (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Fri Feb 28 12:44:03 2003; ** is lower Q always undesireable? In the Henry 3K-A, the occasional instability at c. 95MHz appears to be supported by the high-Q resonance of the (Al) enclosure. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich...,; /archives//html/Amps/2003-02/msg00515.html (6,956 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]