Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Stainless\s+Steel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Stainless\s+Steel\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Stainless Steel (score: 1): Author: MorgusMagnificen at aol.com (MorgusMagnificen@aol.com); Date: Sat Mar 1 10:33:44 2003; As usual, an attempt is under way to reduce the solution to a complex problem to a one-liner. The closest I can get to that is : Stainless, or any material with a conductivity significantly less than; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00008.html (10,244 bytes)
2. [Amps] Stainless Steel (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Sat Mar 1 11:39:58 2003; This is probably why Multronics/Cardwell positions their inductors about one coil-radius above the mounting chassis. cheerz, Eric - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00009.html (6,506 bytes)
3. [Amps] Stainless Steel (score: 1): Author: w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat Mar 1 13:37:22 2003; problem material any rule Apply it by considering the current density, or the total current flowing in a given cross-section of material. Contrary to all the notions about magnetic and non-magnetic,; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00011.html (10,838 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]