- 1. Re: [Amps] Subject header (score: 1)
- Author: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
- Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:55:57 +0100
- OK, that's your view. I do not intend doing that. I have been a member for many years. It is not the wishes of one person. I've had a couple of emails from others agreeing with me. Most however have
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00067.html (8,941 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Subject header (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 04:12:44 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I'm with the Doc on this one. My email program sorts threads by the subject line. Changing it creates a new thread so messages which should be together are not. Not a big dea
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00068.html (7,805 bytes)
- 3. [Amps] Subject header (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 04:41:59 -0700
- Leaving the original subject header is a 2 x edged sword. If u do a search for say... "sb-220 bandswitch" the post will start with sb-220 band switch issues. This then immediately goes off on a tange
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00071.html (6,977 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] Subject header (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Dawson" <jdawson@jasystems.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:20:22 -0500
- This makes about as much sense as hitting "Reply" to a group message in a group forum and automatically replying to only the original poster, not the group. ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ......Not a big deal, bu
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00075.html (7,556 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] Subject header (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:58:23 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I don't understand your message. Perhaps your email program is different from mine, but whether I reply to the group or to an individual, the subject line stays the same. Ple
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-04/msg00079.html (8,024 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu