Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+TL\-922\s+Revisited\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+TL\-922\s+Revisited\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] TL-922 Revisited. (score: 1): Author: g.m.mcadams@worldnet.att.net (Gary McAdams); Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:05:49 -0000; Hello all, I am looking for explanations for an occurrence with my TL-922. Let me state a couple of things up front, because this could easily become another endless thread about parasitics. 1. This; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00018.html (8,496 bytes)
2. [Amps] TL-922 Revisited. (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:32:43 -0700; Resistance-wire parasitic suppressrs are not a magic cure-all. They can reduce 120MHz-3-500Z gain to about half of what the stock supppressors yield - but only if they have enough L in the suppresso; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00027.html (10,337 bytes)
3. [Amps] TL-922 Revisited. (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 06:01:14 -0400; Since parasitics don't cause tube problems, as a general rule, and especially since the stock 922 is stable, that change should make no difference. There are an abnormal amount of grid -filaments oc; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00038.html (10,430 bytes)
4. [Amps] TL-922 Revisited. (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 07:46:56 -0700; ? Can parasitics cause tube problems? In "Parasitics Revisited", *QST*, September/October, 1990, there is a photograph of a fil./grid shorted 3-500Z that apparently shorted when the amplifier sustai; /archives//html/Amps/2002-06/msg00040.html (13,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]