- 1. [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion Design Flaw? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 21:50:26 -0800
- Im working on a Ten-Tec Centurion for a customer. I noticed that the load capacitor padders are not hooked to the band switch correctly. The schematic depicts the way they are actually wired in an ac
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-12/msg00007.html (7,986 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion Design Flaw? (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:19:28 -0800
- I'm only guessing, Jim, but maybe take a look at what else is being switched at the same time (like the inductors, and the output configuration). It is my understanding that Ten Tec amps are Pi-L onl
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-12/msg00014.html (7,965 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion Design Flaw? (score: 1)
- Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:24:40 -0600
- I am the one who may have written about the Centurion caps previously. I have modified my Centurion by removing the stock caps and putting in HEC doorknobs. I kept the 40 and 80 m. arrangement and ke
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-12/msg00015.html (9,826 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion Design Flaw? (score: 1)
- Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 05:39:49 -0500 (EST)
- It is my understanding that Ten Tec amps are Pi-L only on the lower bands, which changes the network design, and may impact what values of C are needed back in the tank. Based on the value of the loa
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-12/msg00018.html (8,152 bytes)
- 5. [Amps] Ten-Tec Centurion Design Flaw? (score: 1)
- Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:06:30 -0500
- My TT Centurion seems stable on 160 when running. The current ceramic caps do well but an older doorknob failed. Centurion does not have enough range for matching with SWR > 1.5. I use TT238 to help.
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-12/msg00027.html (7,600 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu