Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+TenTec\+Nichrome\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+TenTec\+Nichrome\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: qrp73 at talk21.com (qrp73@talk21.com); Date: Thu Mar 27 10:48:22 2003; Hi AMPS Ten Tec has released their new 2 X 4cx800 amp, the Titan 3. You can see a good picture on their web page. You can clearly see a Nichrome style suppressor as per Rich's web page instructions.; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00870.html (7,580 bytes)
2. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Thu Mar 27 11:51:54 2003; ** After the October 1988 article on improved parasitic-suppression appeared in *QST*, Ten-Tec tried low VHF-Q suppressors but they abandoned the idea after they found such suppressors get quite hot; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00875.html (8,083 bytes)
3. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: tongaloa at alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Thu Mar 27 12:41:41 2003; Naturally, the higher reactance results in a more intense reactive field leading to greater I and greater I^2R. Why doesn't the same thing happen with the same L as Hi-Q having the same R in parallel; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00876.html (8,929 bytes)
4. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00 at uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Thu Mar 27 13:27:22 2003; It only means that 29MHz was heating up the resistors and no more. Most likely because circulating current was not only flowing thru the Plate tuning capacitor but also thru the plate to ground capac; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00879.html (8,280 bytes)
5. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Thu Mar 27 14:06:48 2003; ** agreed, however, Ten-Tec initially did not figure that out. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00880.html (8,439 bytes)
6. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Thu Mar 27 14:07:33 2003; ** correct ** I do not understand the question. Can you phrase it a bit more determinately? - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00882.html (9,698 bytes)
7. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Thu Mar 27 15:07:53 2003; ** low vhf-Q suppressors are not impressive, except on an admittance/impedance analyzer - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00884.html (9,400 bytes)
8. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: tongaloa at alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Thu Mar 27 15:45:02 2003; I took your statement: to mean, 'they were suppressing parasitics....'. Why does a High Q suppressor, in that context, not behave in the same way as a low Q suppressor if that High Q suppressor has i; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00887.html (10,706 bytes)
9. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: aa4nu at ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Mar 27 15:53:22 2003; And as I recall Rich's article resulted in PLENTY of work for the TT Service Department repairing customer amps from the damage caused by some of the "article tricks" that he seems to constantly try; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00888.html (8,365 bytes)
10. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: vk6apk at eon.net.au (Alek Petkovic); Date: Thu Mar 27 17:24:24 2003; What about their step start? Is that the same as the Emtron or is it the old resistor and relay trick? 3333333, Alek VK6APK; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00891.html (8,252 bytes)
11. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: vk6apk at eon.net.au (Alek Petkovic); Date: Thu Mar 27 17:36:09 2003; I just went to their site and looked at the pics. Aahh that sort of stuff gets me excited. One question though, are those small loading padder capacitors up to the task? The look a bit light on to me; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00892.html (8,483 bytes)
12. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Thu Mar 27 17:53:09 2003; ** So even though Ten-Tec knew that low-Q vhf suppressors damage amplifiers, they used them on their new amplifier? - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00893.html (8,383 bytes)
13. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Thu Mar 27 18:23:01 2003; ** They present a low Rp to the anode at vhf. ** A high Q suppressor shifts the dissipative burden onto R-sup that a L-sup made with resistance-wire would have have otherwise dissipated. In other wo; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00896.html (11,670 bytes)
14. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: tongaloa at alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Fri Mar 28 09:21:12 2003; Exactamundo. This is why the darn Low Q beast is undesireable. The only problems that a low Q supressor solves that aren't solved by the Hi-Q suppressor are: 1)It eliminates the requirement for selec; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00906.html (14,151 bytes)
15. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: 2 at vc.net (2); Date: Fri Mar 28 11:04:53 2003; ** please describe one of these ways. Thanks. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00908.html (8,531 bytes)
16. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: tongaloa at alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Fri Mar 28 12:19:06 2003; minimize undesired positive feedback through careful design. this design may require a phase shift in the feedback path. the component introduced to effect this phase shift will resonate with the res; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00909.html (10,045 bytes)
17. [Amps] TenTec+Nichrome (score: 1): Author: G3SEK at ifwtech.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Sat Mar 29 07:58:41 2003; There is a hairpin strip inductor instead of a coil, but there's no mention of the material anywhere in the web pages or the manual. Yes, very well thought out. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' co; /archives//html/Amps/2003-03/msg00918.html (8,115 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]