Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Time\s+for\s+New\s+Power\s+Meter\s*$/: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:11:19 +0000
Given that the rule at the time was based on input power to the final stage, it begs the question of how could they possibly know without being in your shack? Granted, enforcement then was a far cry
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00054.html (10,835 bytes)

62. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 20:14:13 +0300
When they suspected someone of cheating, they would park their van outside his house and measure field strength. Then they would go inside and measure plate voltage and current (I presume with their
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00056.html (10,800 bytes)

63. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 17:20:43 +0000
Measuring power, especially over a substantial range of frequencies, has always been a difficult task. If it is done by measuring voltage or current, a 1% error in voltage represents 2% error in powe
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00057.html (14,767 bytes)

64. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 07:41:58 +1200
The same people run lots of processor and ALC breaching its meter scale. We don't spend much time talking with them, and if they join our group we give them the arse real quick. It's some work to be
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00060.html (9,576 bytes)

65. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:50:59 +0000
I'm surprised no one has mentioned what is a very useful purpose for an accurate power meter, given that this is an amps reflector, especially.And that is - to determine the efficiency of an amplifie
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00061.html (8,342 bytes)

66. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 13:56:55 -0700
Hi Bill Unfortunately, you can run any power you want and say anything you want on the air now and the FCC doesn't give a big rats a**. If you think that is not a true statement, listen to 3840 any e
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00062.html (10,138 bytes)

67. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 10:23:47 +1200
Sorry to be blunt, but it's not worth anything. Aint no way the regulatory authority inspector can park his vehicle out on the roadside and make up some story that he can read your transmit power wit
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00063.html (8,567 bytes)

68. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 19:01:50 -0400
To be blunt ... in the 1950's and 1960's power limits were based on *input* power not output power. Input power is quite easily and accurately measured as V * I to the final amplifier tube. The citat
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00065.html (9,971 bytes)

69. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:31:11 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: A bit off topic, but I have always wondered why the FCC thinks it has the power to censor profanity. The Constitution guarantees free speech and the Supr
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00067.html (10,164 bytes)

70. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:36:20 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'm sure the folks who got the citations would be interested in your comments. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailin
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00068.html (8,768 bytes)

71. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 02:10:24 +0000
Well there is a difference between ordinary individuals and amateur radio operators. When you are licensed you have agreed to abide by the rules set by the FCC and if you don't the license can be rev
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00075.html (11,465 bytes)

72. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 06:23:08 -0400
Having spent much of my life (Every Monday for nearly 23 years) calibrating instruments in the lab, maintenance, QA and production, it's normal for me to see readings I can believe in, whether that a
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00080.html (12,917 bytes)

73. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Stover <kevin.stover@mediacombb.net>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 08:05:38 -0500
I may be late to this dance but isn't that why they sell more than one slug at different power ratings? A 2500W slug could be off by +/- 125W, a 100W slug would be off by +/-5W anywhere on the meter.
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00081.html (12,130 bytes)

74. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 10:25:11 -0400
I already stated I use a HP 437 with appropriate couplers and attenuators. Ive moved up the 43x food chain over the decades as surplus gear becomes available. Carl KM1H Does anyone use directional co
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00082.html (11,054 bytes)

75. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 10:56:30 -0400
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) If you think that is not a true statement, listen to 3840 any evening. There are more F-bombs dropped there than when I worked in the woods. 73 Tom W7WHY REPLY
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00085.html (10,896 bytes)

76. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 10:57:47 -0400
I dont even consider it that necessary at any ham or 2 way shop test bench, Bird is still the standard and there are enough slug ranges available for most any need. OTOH those slugs add up in price i
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00086.html (11,994 bytes)

77. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "robrk@nidhog.net" <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 23:57:15 -0400
Theres a chart in the manual for the Bird 43 that shows what change in reading is, outside the freq range of the slug Page 4-5. http://www.repeater-builder.com/test-equipment/bird/pdf/bird-43-wattmet
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00089.html (10,653 bytes)

78. [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 01:54:54 -0700
There?s a chart in the manual for the Bird 43 that shows what change in reading is, outside the freq range of the slug Page 4-5?. http://www.repeater-builder.com/test-equipment/bird/pdf/bird-43-wattm
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00092.html (10,185 bytes)

79. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 14:45:58 +0000 (UTC)
At least on this end, the PDF comes up with blank pages. Glen, K9STH Website: http://k9sth.net From: Jim Thomson <jim.thom@telus.net> To: amps@contesting.com Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 3:54 AM Subje
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00093.html (9,229 bytes)

80. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: RMorris <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:18:07 -0400
Page works on an iPhone and a nine year old iMac/Firefox. ?? The Bird is a tool. I had one with no gray paint left. It rolled around in bottom of five Ford Broncos, with used donuts and McDonald wrap
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00095.html (8,851 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu