Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Transformers\s+for\s+HB\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Transformers\s+for\s+HB\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Transformers for HB? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:17:53 -0400; Good points Lee. Now here Im going to offer a somewaht radical departure from finding a pole pig or 200# WW2 iron. For the technically savy and safety knowledgeable why not go AC/DC? Yes it requires; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00636.html (14,201 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Transformers for HB? (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:40:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I have been waiting for years for reasonably priced transistors which can deliver 1500 watts while running of a line-rectified 150 VDC. I think they're getting close, but the; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00653.html (8,988 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Transformers for HB? (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:17:53 -0400; The problem with transistors is two fold. One is getting rid of the heat. The transistors are small meaning a small area for heat conduction and a high delta T even with the best of heat sink compoun; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00667.html (10,922 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Transformers for HB? (score: 1): Author: "Zeitler, Lane LT, FST-1" <zeitlel@cpr3.navy.mil>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:57:07 -0800; Good points Carl. AG6K used to have a nice circuit design on his web site for an inexpensive yet effective hi-pot tester. Lane Ku7i Good points Lee. Now here Im going to offer a somewaht radical depa; /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00774.html (15,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]