Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+WATER\s+for\s+vapor\s+cooled\s+amplifier\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+WATER\s+for\s+vapor\s+cooled\s+amplifier\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] WATER for vapor cooled amplifier (score: 1): Author: Dan Elyea <fsiyfr@okeechobee.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:28:21 -0500; My place of work is an HF transmitting facility. We have a number of 100 kW transmitters using the vapor phase cooling approach. Back in 1977, when we brought the first one on the air, we were having; /archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00093.html (8,511 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] WATER for vapor cooled amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:47:13 -0600; Yep exactly DI water is mostly for use in laboratories, you would need to specify the dielectric capability with the water company. They should know everything. Just as quality distilled water is imp; /archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00094.html (9,326 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] WATER for vapor cooled amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Harold Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:16:14 -0500; Okay, so let's back up one step and sorta tabulate our findings and observations: 1. Someone found that Deionized water was too conductive. 2. Altronics says never to use DI water in loads. 3. Someon; /archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00095.html (8,754 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] WATER for vapor cooled amplifier (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:32:29 -0500; A significant difference in the use of water with RF loads is that it is not mixed with high-voltage and accordingly, probably no real reason to minimize leakage, but immunity to long-term corrosion; /archives//html/Amps/2007-02/msg00096.html (8,134 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]