Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+What\'s\s+a\s+better\s+rheostat\s+placement\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+What\'s\s+a\s+better\s+rheostat\s+placement\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] What's a better rheostat placement ? (score: 1): Author: w2cqm@juno.com; Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 11:08:00 -0500; Due to a high 250VAC primary voltage, the dedicated filament voltage transformer (15VCT @ 22 amps) for a series wired retrofitted pair of 3cx1200A7's in a Henry 3KA is about 1 volt too high. The 220V; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00087.html (7,396 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] What's a better rheostat placement ? (score: 1): Author: Tony King - W4ZT <amps080605@w4zt.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:14:01 -0500; Primary is the only way to go :) 73, Tony W4ZT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00088.html (7,729 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] What's a better rheostat placement ? (score: 1): Author: HAROLD B MANDEL <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 11:16:31 -0500; Dear Ron, I recently put together an outboard supply and needed to have a wide range of filament control, especially with dual primaries for 117/234 vac in the filament xfmr. The solution was to inst; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00089.html (7,140 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] What's a better rheostat placement ? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 12:06:31 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Into the primary. It would never handle the current if wired on the secondary side. Bill, W6WRT ___________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00096.html (7,537 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]