Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Why\s+are\s+833s\s+so\s+Expensive\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Why\s+are\s+833s\s+so\s+Expensive\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Roger <roger@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:28:45 -0400; Subject pretty much says it all. 833s are running over $125 ($258 for a pair) each although they vary from $100 to $200 each on e-bay. I don't know if they are selling any, but the price has been tha; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00315.html (7,431 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:13:25 +0800; Yeah, I've just bought 4 GU81M's and Dr Alex is posting me a pair of sockets as I write. Should be an interesting project. . . . if I can ever find the time. 73, Alek VK6APK From sunny Binningup, Wes; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00316.html (8,643 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: "Hsu" <hsu4qro@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:33:05 +0800; Hi Roger, I live near one of 833A's manufacturer.only 1km haha. Now, the 833A manufacturer's list price is CNY 600 orso, ( no more than $100) But if quantity what you want is big, I think it should b; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00317.html (8,301 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:04:07 +0000 (GMT); The GU81Ms do indeed have a good reputation here in Europe as being a tube that can withstand fearful abuse. They keep on working long after they should have melted. I bought a load of these things; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00318.html (11,028 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:34:12 +0800; G'day Dave, Yes, I would envisage a low frequency, monoband amp with the GU81M's. Dunno about 4 of them. I'm sure 2 will do. I've always fancied the idea of having a microwave oven door glass and scr; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00319.html (13,490 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:36:56 +0000 (GMT); Hi Alek - yes, I think that for the "real radio that glows in the dark" the GU81M would take some beating. I did toy with the idea of using the 'glass'-plus-screen from a microwave oven door as part; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00320.html (14,107 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:03:30 EDT; Sorry Dave, it is still baffling! 73, Gerald K5GW In a message dated 9/27/2010 4:37:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time, mausoptik@btinternet.com writes: Hi Alek - yes, I think that for the "real radio tha; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00321.html (14,169 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:32:51 -0400; Who's on first, Whats on second, etc. You ever hear that routine by Abbott and Costello Dave? Carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00322.html (10,027 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:53:44 -0500; But why are the wickets sticky, and why would someone want to take a sticky wicket ? A clean wicket would be my preference. Don WA4NPL _______________________________________________ Amps mailing lis; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00323.html (8,860 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:06:34 +0000 (GMT); Who's on first, Whats on second, etc. You ever hear that routine by Abbott and Costello Dave? Carl Hi Carl, yes, absolute classic - I'd not heard it in years, but found it here: http://www.youtube.c; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00324.html (8,295 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT); Hi Roger, Perhaps because they are used here: http://www.wavac-audio.jp/sh833_e.shtml which retails for $175,000 73 & Good morning, Marv WC6W http://qsl.net/wc6w/ -- On Sun, 9/26/10, Roger <roger@rog; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00325.html (9,616 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Roger <roger@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:41:00 -0400; At least it'll be impressive looking. Staying within the ratings, they are derated in a hurry as you go up in frequency, but OTOH the GU81M is noted for being rugged. How far they can be pushed? I do; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00326.html (11,804 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:15:21 +0800; Now THAT is the best audiophool stuff I've read in a long, long time. Thanks for the link. 73, Alek. VK6APK From sunny Binningup, Western Australia http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk http://www.qrz.com/db/; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00335.html (11,386 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: mikea <mikea@mikea.ath.cx>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:35 -0500; $10,500 for a 5-input passive attenuator. I'll take two more gallons of snake oil, Doctor; I've got a place to get rid of it at a profit, but I'm not tellin' where. -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mikea@mikea; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00338.html (8,407 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:13:09 +0000 (GMT); Well I'm just delighted to see that potentially someone ELSE is keeping up consumer spending to help us out of the downturn .... because I'm certainly not Dave G0OIL $10,500 for a 5-input passive att; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00339.html (9,053 bytes)
16. [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:33:00 -0700; Hi Roger, Perhaps because they are used here: http://www.wavac-audio.jp/sh833_e.shtml which retails for $175,000 73 & Good morning, Marv WC6W http://qsl.net/wc6w/ http://www.covenantaudio.com/product; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00340.html (8,864 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Patrick Barthelow <apolloeme@live.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:28:58 -0700; Sheesh...... Must be a market for these things. It would be interesting to see proof of how many have sold so far. IMHO this is proof that there are an awful lot of people with too much money. Probab; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00341.html (10,952 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: Roger <roger@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:50:15 -0400; I'm sorry for the delay in answering by I was injured by flying glass when my BS meter exploded. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00359.html (11,017 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: W2XJ <W2XJ@W2XJ.NET>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:24:54 -0400; Rfparts has 833s for less than $100. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00361.html (12,870 bytes)
20. Re: [Amps] Why are 833s so Expensive (score: 1): Author: mikea <mikea@mikea.ath.cx>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:35:06 -0500; Condolences and sympathy. I finally managed to get all the Coca-Cola out of this keyboard, after multiple runs through the dishwasher: when I read the ad at the URL above, I *splorffffed* very hard i; /archives//html/Amps/2010-09/msg00362.html (9,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]