- 21. Re: [Amps] World's worst coax connectors (score: 1)
- Author: <vk6jx@bigpond.net.au>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:57:57 +0800
- Understood on the music recording front. Thanks, John I cited Bennett because the dynamic range of a performance like his is at least 30 dB greater than that of a rock band, making noise pickup on qu
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-04/msg00050.html (9,900 bytes)
- 22. Re: [Amps] World's worst coax connectors (score: 1)
- Author: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:52:11 -0700
- <I then must ask: if Neutrik, Switchcraft and other high-end XLR <manufacturers have for decades provided a shell solder terminal, then for <what purpose does it serve? Why not eliminate it altogethe
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-04/msg00052.html (9,968 bytes)
- 23. Re: [Amps] World's worst coax connectors (score: 1)
- Author: g4piq via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 12:23:48 +0100 (BST)
- Interesting discussion which reminded me of reading about a rather remarkable case of RFI into a professional audio system. In 1972 Mike Oldfield recorded Tubular Bells at a studio about 40 miles fro
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-04/msg00053.html (9,337 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu