Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+bird\s+watts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+bird\s+watts\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] bird watts (score: 1): Author: HAROLD B MANDEL <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:36:43 -0500; A previous post called attention to an amplifier being sold that had a reference to "bird watts." Yesterday this term arose in another conversation and I asked the broadcast engineer I was speaking w; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00163.html (8,853 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] bird watts (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:59:41 EST; There are many different RF Power wattmeters, but the Bird 43 with a 5 or 10KW slug connected in-line to the nearby antenna is the hands-down final say of True Power in that group. In my circle of HA; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00164.html (6,738 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] bird watts (score: 1): Author: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:49:17 +0000; Don't worship the Bird. The Bird 43's I was testing twenty years ago were rarely within 5% of FSD. Most were within 10% of FSD, but still a significant fraction were outside of that. (These measureme; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00167.html (8,359 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]