Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+every\s+db\s+lost\s+re\s+Tubes\s+vs\.\s+Solid\s+State\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@knology.net>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 16:33:07 -0400
I realize that the investment of a proper crimping tool and dies for UHF is an investment of not insignificant proportions. But compared to the investment in a modern SS transceiver, it's a small pri
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00028.html (11,888 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: "Sam Carpenter" <sam@owenscommunication.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:50:49 -0400
I wish they were all N or HN or DIN Connectors. I have seen some pl259, and even N connectors do ugly things under load, admittedly more at higher frequencies. Commercially we are using DIN Connector
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00030.html (13,642 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Martin A Flynn <maflynn@theflynn.org>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 17:19:17 -0400
Our club station (N2MO) is migrating to 7/16 DIN on the patch bays, feedlines, and baluns. Even the feeds for the EME antenna are being converted to 7/16 DIN. The driver is cost as there is a abundan
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00032.html (9,162 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 17:55:37 -0400
At 1800W an N gets barely warm on 144 MHz and a bit warmer at 400W on 432. The combined pair of Eimac cavities at 500W gets decidely toasty on 903 (-; These are all silver plated USA mil-spec. A simi
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00034.html (15,997 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:45:17 -0700
Both. See the family of curves in the ARRL Handbook for excess attenuation due to mismatch, which has been in every edition of the handbook since I've been buying it (the 50s), and which I've confirm
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00061.html (10,896 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:41:00 -0400
Speaking of connector loss, the mismatch loss that a connector may provide is only valid when the system generator is a fixed value and there is no re-reflection of reflected power at the generator.
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00070.html (12,772 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Tom Thompson <tlthompson@qwest.net>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:58:00 -0600
Larry is correct. Mismatch loss does not necessarily involve a feed line. Mismatch loss is the loss in dB of the power delivered to a load that is not conjugately matched to the source compared to th
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00085.html (12,893 bytes)

28. [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 03:31:10 -0700
I sold them for fifty cents each at hamfests. Jim At one time I had bought a few of those offshore right angle UHF connectors... and they caused no end of grief from day1 Heres what you do with any j
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00104.html (9,293 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:44:26 -0400
These are miniscule. The loss figures are for the maximum frequency. Even on 144 and 440 I may have as many as a dozen connectors from the exciter, amp, top and bottom of the tower, power dividers an
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00113.html (10,529 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu