Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ft\-2000\s+vs\s+pgxl\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+ft\-2000\s+vs\s+pgxl\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] ft-2000 vs pgxl (score: 1): Author: <k1ttt.dave@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:31:45 -0400; A couple related questions for both Yaesu and amps guys. Just had to send pgxl back for replacement of an ldmos. They say one possible cause of ldmos failure is not allowing for at least 20msec betwe; /archives//html/Amps/2021-09/msg00000.html (7,420 bytes)
2. [Amps] ft-2000 vs pgxl (score: 1): Author: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:10:39 -0700; <Just had to send pgxl back for replacement of an ldmos. They say one <possible cause of ldmos failure is not allowing for at least 20msec between <ptt and rf, which I thought I had set. but maybe no; /archives//html/Amps/2021-09/msg00001.html (10,268 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] ft-2000 vs pgxl (score: 1): Author: "Bob Wilson, N6TV" <n6tv@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 17:05:05 -0700; The *QST *review says the TX Delay of the FT-2000 was measured at 35 ms on SSB. See http://www.arrl.org/files/file/protected/Group/Members/ProductReview/pdf/pr0702.pdf . For the FT-2000D it is 37 ms; /archives//html/Amps/2021-09/msg00002.html (9,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]