Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+mobile\s+amp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+mobile\s+amp\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] mobile amp (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:33:39 -0500; I had to tell about what I'd found for several reasons here. I got to looking and found that they still make the old 6 and 12 Vdc 3 and 4 pin vibrators. I recon theyre still making some new sockets f; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00206.html (7,610 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] mobile amp (score: 1): Author: Tomm Aldridge <KD7QAE@ARRL.NET>; Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 06:06:36 +0000; Note they also have ferrite rods at the bottom of the referenced page. Good for filament chokes. Note also that I have refrained from making any vibrator jokes (hi hi). Tomm ha ______________________; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00207.html (8,911 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] mobile amp (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philk5pc@tyler.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:22:32 -0600; No joke...I just bought a 1948 Ford today, and the radio is kaput. Thanks for the info on the vibrators and coils, Will! One never knows who is lurking out there in need of weird stuff!! (((73))) Ph; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00209.html (7,583 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] mobile amp (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 04:21:50 -0800; Absolutely off-topic as well as seriously indecent. Where's the FCC when we really need them? Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Am; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00216.html (7,294 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] mobile amp (score: 1): Author: Mark Hill <g4fph@mjha.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:40:58 +0000; That reminds me: Anyone got any old Steely Dan records they want to trade? (Rich started it!) Regards. Mark. ** Mark Hill - G4FPH E-mail: g4fph@mjha.co.uk Current web pages at: www.qsl.net/g4fph Old; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00218.html (8,204 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] mobile amp (score: 1): Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:57:37 -0500; Dear Mark, Sorry to report of no Steely Dan disks, but I came up with a Donald Fagan "The Nightfly," on LP. Cuts include: I.G.Y., Green Flower Street, Ruby Baby, Maxine, New Frontier, The Nightfly, T; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00219.html (7,466 bytes)
7. [Amps] Mobile amp (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:35:26 -0400; I ran across this on ebay for any who might want to convert an 11 meter mobile over to an amateur amp. I don't know who's building these as this brand is a new one on me but by the looks of the insid; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00482.html (7,053 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Mobile amp (score: 1): Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:38:02 -0500; WillSeveral peculiarities- This thing is small- if I compared right, it's only about 5 inches wide. The text says it's for 40M to 10M, which, if true, means it is "no tune". I would bet it is 11M, bu; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00486.html (8,326 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Mobile amp (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:56:04 -0400; Bill, What I seen there were the two sets of input and output transformers, a splitter on the LH side (smallest toroid), and the combiner on the RH side (largest toroid). On the input transformers, t; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00487.html (10,514 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Mobile amp (score: 1): Author: PlanerGuy@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:29:10 EDT; This appears to be a Class C variation of a Messenger. I say Class C because there isn't the usual wirewound resistor and clamping diode evident in the picture. The rest of it is all Messenger design; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00492.html (6,878 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Mobile amp (score: 1): Author: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:01:10 -0500; <<"no tune". >> ??? This puzzles me... All solid state amps using properly designed wide-band transformers are "no tune". Why would you buy/ want/ accept anything else? Sincerely, Dr. William J. Schm; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00493.html (10,321 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Mobile amp (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:36:52 -0400; Jack, I'm not for sure who's making them any more. Henry used to make a good one and I don't know if they have any left or not. They were really well made, or the ones I've seen. Best, Will ** REPLY; /archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00504.html (12,816 bytes)
13. [Amps] Mobile Amp (score: 1): Author: rick darwicki <n6pe@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 07:26:34 -0700 (PDT); Thanks guys, sorry I asked :-) Rick, N6PE == Talk is cheap... except when Congress does it. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/Amps/2012-10/msg00058.html (6,269 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]