- 1. [Amps] screen grid current question on gu-84b (score: 1)
- Author: "ka1mwp" <ka1mwp@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:08:08 -0400
- I assembled the amp over the last few months using the TETRODE boards. Info: plate voltage = 2350 Grid 1 -65v Grid 2 365v RF Input 50ohm to ground You can see the schematic at http://home.comcast.net
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00164.html (7,587 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] screen grid current question on gu-84b (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:18:11 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: It sounds ok so far. I have not used a GU-84b but I have used a 4CX1000A and they should be similar. With zero drive, the screen current is a little negative. With increasing
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00165.html (7,756 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] screen grid current question on gu-84b (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:02:37 -0400
- It depends on the particular type of tube used. With a 4CX1000 I experienced similar readings to what Bill notes. However when the screen current was in the negative region, tuning the plate tuning w
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00166.html (10,680 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] screen grid current question on gu-84b (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:22:03 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Good point. I forgot to mention that while an Eimac and a Taylor 4CX1000A both tuned in the same general manner, the Eimac showed much greater negative screen current than th
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-04/msg00167.html (7,414 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu