Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+transformer\s+secondary\s+winding\s+resistance\s+here\s+we\s+go\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+transformer\s+secondary\s+winding\s+resistance\s+here\s+we\s+go\s+again\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again (score: 1): Author: "Partain, Chuck" <Chuck_Partain@Maxtor.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:08:45 -0700; Maybe I am missing something. If a transformer is able to handle the output current without getting hot or saturating and it meets the size requirement why is the secondary resistance should a concer; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00151.html (7,100 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:37:39 -0800; ** More R means less V-regulation. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00166.html (7,706 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:51:58 +0000; Partain, Chuck wrote: Maybe I am missing something. If a transformer is able to handle the output current without getting hot or saturating and it meets the size requirement why is the secondary resi; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00169.html (8,126 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again (score: 1): Author: RFlabnotes@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:20:36 EST; Chuck: The key to your statement is "...is capable of handling....", whatever that is supposed to mean. The basic fact is that if the secondary has R ohms of resistance, then with a load of I amperes; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00207.html (7,732 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@qsl.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:51:17 +0000; And don't forget it's the rms value of current to use here. With a capacitor input supply, rms current can be several times the dc current so (Irms squared) can easily be 5x (Idc squared). Steve ____; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00212.html (8,018 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:41:47 -0800; ** Steve - 10x I-dc^2 is more like it with a low ESR and a C-filter. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00222.html (8,402 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]