- 1. [Amps] why a 200 watt transceiver? (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:11:04 +0000
- If u have a choice, buy the 200 watt version of a radio. Two good reasons... -Amazing how much 200w does that 100w does not. Double power seems to have 4X the results. Don't know why, but it really h
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00038.html (6,794 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] why a 200 watt transceiver? (score: 1)
- Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 04:40:03 +0000
- Let's see; 200 watts = $3,100 while 400 watts = $11,000 !! Who says the economy is in the toilet ??? 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00044.html (7,600 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] why a 200 watt transceiver? (score: 1)
- Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:47:31 -0400
- You must be looking at the cheap models. Both yaesu and Icom have 100 watt models that run close to $13,000USD You'll know if I ever won the lottery as I'd get two of the big Icoms (one for the Den a
- /archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00047.html (8,801 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu