Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k9ay@k9ay.com: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Antennaware] Equivalent Diameter of Triangular Tower (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:29:29 -0600
Bill and all, If I change from 5" to 8" the reactance moves the right way, but the resistance moves the opposite direction. The net result is that the model is a little closer to the measurement, but
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00050.html (8,845 bytes)

42. Re: [Antennaware] Equivalent Diameter of Triangular Tower (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:24:23 -0600
Equivalent diameter of Rohn 25 This is where I found the reference to 5" (5.25" actually) as the equivalent radius of Rohn 25 tower: William F. Cummings (K6MYH), "Tower Equivalent Radius," Conference
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00051.html (10,309 bytes)

43. Re: [Antennaware] Equivalent Diameter of Triangular Tower (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:29:39 -0600
I need to be a better editor of my own material! ... _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing list Antennaware@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/a
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00052.html (7,520 bytes)

44. Re: [Antennaware] Equivalent Diameter of Triangular Tower (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:02:14 -0600
Let me correct any confusion I caused... In my contribution to the discussion of tower equivalent cross-section, all my references should be RADIUS, not diameter. Thus, the reference uncovered by Bil
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-02/msg00056.html (8,331 bytes)

45. [Antennaware] 160M vertical impedance (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:20:40 -0600
I finally took some time to review my modeling vs. measurement of the feed impedance of my 160M vertical. To review -- my original model showed 39.8 +j48 ohms at 1850 kHz, with 8" diameter (yes, diam
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-03/msg00002.html (8,465 bytes)

46. Re: [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:35:03 -0500
Notes on the dual-feed K9AY Loop.... "Dual feed" is the equivalent of a remote R +/-jX termination, plus the ability to compensate for asymmetry and systems losses such as wire loss, hence the extrem
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00010.html (9,112 bytes)

47. Re: [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:42:47 -0500
Both feed and termination will see the same ground loss, so Rterm is 500 ohms minus the total ground loss, not half of it. ...K9AY _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00011.html (7,531 bytes)

48. Re: [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:25:53 -0500
See: http://www.aytechnologies.com/TechData/K9AYLoopArrays.pdf This is a presentation on arrays of K9AY Loops prepared for the W9DXCC meeting a couple years back. While working on the article, I put
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00012.html (10,003 bytes)

49. Re: [Antennaware] 2 element tribanders (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:19:33 -0500
John, In general, tribanders with longer elements should be more efficient, and generally get better reviews by their users. Of the ones you mention, the TH-2 and TA-32 fit the above criteria, but do
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00016.html (8,379 bytes)

50. Re: [Antennaware] Help! Which One (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:33:00 -0500
Paul (KG7HF) ________ Radials for verticals make all the difference in the world, just like height does for horizontal antennas. Before writing off verticals, note one of my experiences: In 1985 aft
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00022.html (8,017 bytes)

51. Re: [Antennaware] Tribanders on 12m/17m (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:12:15 -0500
I've owned a Hy-Gain Explorer 14 and now have a Cushcraft X-9. Both worked on 12M; the EX-14 even had some F/B. Only used them a few times to work DXpeditions when another antenna was not available.
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00027.html (8,470 bytes)

52. Re: [Antennaware] feedline modeling (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:34:04 -0500
Paul, Best info is in W7EL's Notes for the two log periodic examples in EZNEC (LogPer and LogPerTL), one with interconnecting wires, the other with transmission lines. Gary K9AY _____________________
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-09/msg00036.html (7,409 bytes)

53. Re: [Antennaware] plot comparisons - addition (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:55:52 -0600
Dave, EZNEC does this automatically if you recall a saved trace and add it to the current trace. If you are overlaying exported bitmap files in a graphics program, choose a fixed outer ring value in
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00006.html (8,355 bytes)

54. Re: [Antennaware] plot comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:27:04 -0600
Dave and all, To quote from W7EL's Help File: "Note that .pf format files saved as 'trace files' are not graphics files. They are binary files which contain only numerical field strength data, and no
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00009.html (9,495 bytes)

55. Re: [Antennaware] plot comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:03:19 -0600
Most graphics programs let you rotate, flip and change colors. One handy action is to show all patterns of directional arrays -- e.g. to show the four directions of a 4-square, I simply take the orig
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00011.html (8,870 bytes)

56. Re: [Antennaware] 3 element sideways vees - coax lengths? (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:00:59 -0600
Dan, You can examine the stub-tuned reflector behavior using the EZNEC Transmission Line feature. The K3LR et al approach looks best to me, with the reflectors tuned for maximum smoke, but there are
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-11/msg00015.html (9,969 bytes)

57. [Antennaware] Jerry Sevick W2FMI (SK) (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:28:17 -0600
Fellow hams, Jerry Sevick, W2FMI, one of ham radio's great technical contributors, has passed away. I received word from his family that Jerry died peacefully this past Sunday at the age of 90. I hav
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-12/msg00000.html (8,037 bytes)

58. Re: [Antennaware] Vertical Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:00:25 -0600
Dave, One of my past projects was a no-radial multi-band vertical with a feed similar to what you propose. I found two alternatives for isolating the feedline. The first was a 1.77:1 transmission lin
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-12/msg00007.html (8,949 bytes)

59. Re: [Antennaware] Vertical Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:50:45 -0600
One more option is a ground plane, with two, three or four sloping radials. With this configuration, you can achieve a low-VSWR match by adjusting the angle of the radials, and coupling/common-mode o
/archives//html/Antennaware/2009-12/msg00011.html (7,549 bytes)

60. Re: [Antennaware] Modeling (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:48:07 -0600
When the finished product works exactly as modeled, it is ALWAYS a combination of: a) The model's ability to represent reality. b) Consistent, predictable behavior of the construction medium. c) The
/archives//html/Antennaware/2010-03/msg00021.html (8,389 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu