Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+20m\s+rotatable\s+dipole\s+configuration\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+20m\s+rotatable\s+dipole\s+configuration\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Antennaware] 20m rotatable dipole configuration? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Young" <paul@g0hwc.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:02:37 -0000; Hi all, I am building a full size 20m rotatable dipole and wondered what others think. Would I be best to have it in a horizontal or in a V configuration? Paul G0HWC Check out my website www.g0hwc.co; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-12/msg00005.html (6,643 bytes)
2. Re: [Antennaware] 20m rotatable dipole configuration? (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:17:36 -0800; Although there are no absolutes when it comes to antennas, if you have a rotatable configuration, the straight dipole would be much better, since it will have nice nulls off the ends and slightly mor; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-12/msg00006.html (7,465 bytes)
3. Re: [Antennaware] 20m rotatable dipole configuration? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Young" <paul@g0hwc.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:15:37 -0000; Thanks for all the replies, its been most helpfull. I have now put it up as a horizontal and fed with a balun. Thanks again Paul G0HWC www.g0hwc.com _______________________________________________ An; /archives//html/Antennaware/2007-12/msg00008.html (6,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]