Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Cubical\s+Quad\s+antenna\s+model\s+for\s+VOACAP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Antennaware\]\s+Cubical\s+Quad\s+antenna\s+model\s+for\s+VOACAP\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Antennaware] Cubical Quad antenna model for VOACAP (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:59:09 -0400; Modeling a single or 2 element quad and a dipole and 2 element yagi in free space shows the "why" of the difference. In the vertical plane bisecting the elements, a quad element squeezes the vertical; /archives//html/Antennaware/2006-05/msg00013.html (8,782 bytes)
2. Re: [Antennaware] Cubical Quad antenna model for VOACAP (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 15:41:28 -0400; Guy, I have recently modeled a two element 30/40M quad on a 20' boom (0.205 and 0.142 lambda respectively) and got free space gains of 7.4-7.5 dBi. My design criteria were maximum gain and a reasonab; /archives//html/Antennaware/2006-05/msg00014.html (9,538 bytes)
3. Re: [Antennaware] Cubical Quad antenna model for VOACAP (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:26:37 -0400; (0.205 and 0.142 lambda respectively) and got free space gains of 7.4-7.5 dBi. My design criteria were maximum gain and a reasonable match to 100 ohms. How much gain are you observing for two and thr; /archives//html/Antennaware/2006-05/msg00015.html (7,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]