- 1. [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
- Author: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:05:14 -0400
- Excellent thread here guys. So much so that I have switched out of digest mode and into real time mode. A few notes on the K9AY - some perhaps more relevant than others. 1. The far field pattern is A
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00008.html (9,591 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:16:13 -0400
- Maybe taking it farther afield, but I have done modeling experiments (plus one winter's Europe-only experiments) using two K9AY loops end-fire, spaced 135 feet, with 180-degree phasing obtained by si
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00009.html (12,185 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
- Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:35:03 -0500
- Notes on the dual-feed K9AY Loop.... "Dual feed" is the equivalent of a remote R +/-jX termination, plus the ability to compensate for asymmetry and systems losses such as wire loss, hence the extrem
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00010.html (9,112 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
- Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:42:47 -0500
- Both feed and termination will see the same ground loss, so Rterm is 500 ohms minus the total ground loss, not half of it. ...K9AY _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00011.html (7,531 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
- Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:25:53 -0500
- See: http://www.aytechnologies.com/TechData/K9AYLoopArrays.pdf This is a presentation on arrays of K9AY Loops prepared for the W9DXCC meeting a couple years back. While working on the article, I put
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00012.html (10,003 bytes)
- 6. [Antennaware] Dual fed K9AY (score: 1)
- Author: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:57:47 -0800
- Agree with Gary on all points - thanks for jumping in Gary. I have only ever viewed the two vertical analogy as a rough approximation of the antenna - useful for explaining it simplistically. It is a
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2009-05/msg00013.html (10,179 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu