- 1. [Antennaware] Traps (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:59:51 -0500
- Some questions about traps: With regard to coaxial vs. discrete component traps, some have said that coaxial traps exhibit about 3 dB loss over discrete types. Where is this loss manifested? How does
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-12/msg00000.html (6,104 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Antennaware] Traps (score: 1)
- Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:46:07 -0600
- Dallas, It's difficult to get accurate measurements of trap performance, but a few general points are: * High-Q traps with inductors and fixed capacitors are the lowest loss, but voltage breakdown in
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-12/msg00001.html (8,977 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Antennaware] Traps (score: 1)
- Author: "Mauri" <i4jmy@iol.it>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:42:22 +0100
- I want to add some detail and considerations about the above. Although extra losses in a dipole/vertical (of reasonable size) are more or less coincidentd with trap losses, traps and coils in parasi
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-12/msg00002.html (8,645 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Antennaware] Traps (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:04:36 -0500
- To all, I have received a number of very interesting replie to my questions. Some of the issues are still open, but there is a lot of reference material that I must yet sift through. All of your thou
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-12/msg00003.html (10,565 bytes)
- 5. [Antennaware] Traps (score: 1)
- Author: "Frank" <fravin@glocalnet.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:33:15 +0100
- Hi I follow with great interest the discussion regarding using a trap in the inverted L-config for the 80/160m bands. Iam in the processing of building one antennas and was thinking of more like a ba
- /archives//html/Antennaware/2005-12/msg00004.html (6,752 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu