Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+EZNEC\s+or\s+MININEC\s+for\s+Windows\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+EZNEC\s+or\s+MININEC\s+for\s+Windows\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [antennaware] EZNEC or MININEC for Windows? (score: 1): Author: tadanley@mindspring.com (Tad Danley, K3TD); Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 01:16:13 +0000; I would like to get some antenna modeling software to play with and wonder if anyone has comments on either of these programs? My main interest is verticals and wires for the 160 to 10 meter bands. T; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-01/msg00014.html (7,441 bytes)
2. [antennaware] EZNEC or MININEC for Windows? (score: 1): Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed); Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:27:51 -0500; Tad, Everyone will have a bit different opinon on which antenna modeling program to use. First, be sure to check W4RNL's web site and his recent articles in the various magazines -- That will help yo; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-01/msg00016.html (9,260 bytes)
3. [antennaware] EZNEC or MININEC for Windows? (score: 1): Author: kaufmann@ll.mit.edu (John Kaufmann); Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:57:51 -0500; This is good advice. Although I use EZNEC almost all the time, there are some situations where MININEC (ELNEC) is more accurate. In my modeling work, one of the big advantages of EZNEC is the availab; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-01/msg00017.html (7,711 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]