Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Aldewey@aol.com: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] NCJ Mar/Apr (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:20:06 -0400
On the cover it lists "Rebuilding 40 Meter Cushcraft Loading Coils". I can't find this anywhere in the issue? Am I blind or is it Aprils Fool? nz All; This article was inadvertantly left out of the M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00576.html (8,075 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callsign "appendages" in QSO party logs (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 15:55:50 EDT
In the early days of the Minnesota QSO Party, we tried to get by with two letter county abbreviations. So the mobiles were signing things like /SV , /RA, /OT , etc. We had guys tell us we were illega
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00019.html (8,288 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary of how to improve contesting (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:03:57 EDT
and have something limited for written media. This is one I struggle with. I certainly agree with the importance of quality writeups but I am not sure I fully endorse moving all line scores (except f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00321.html (8,787 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] adding challenges to field day (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:54:35 EDT
IMHO, not necessarily? How about the, "fun" that the 1D operators have? Not everyone, myself included, is inclined to operate "while handling generators. logging networks, turning antennas manually,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00407.html (8,762 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest history (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:12:17 EDT
Too bad the arrl does not make National Contest Journal back issues available on line. My guess, and it's only a guess, is that Newington staff time is an issue, along with a perceived lack of demand
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00402.html (7,892 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] 48 hour straight contest operation and human output (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:21:07 -0400
All; Keep an eye out for the Nov/Dec, 2009 issue of NCJ. The focus is "Contester Health" and there are several good articles on how you can endure a long contest without killing yourself! 73, Al, K0A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00322.html (11,071 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Musings... (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:02:48 EST
I am perfectly fine with guys calling me at the speed they are comfortable with. I almost always slow down when they do this which is fine. I spend a lot of time with the ALT F9 and ALT F10 keys duri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00271.html (8,870 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about USB to Serial (DB9) port adapters (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:02:59 EST
The general consensus seems to be that the FTDI chipset is most compatible and most reliable. You can find products that use the FTDI chipset at: http://www.byterunner.com/byterunner/category=Serial+
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00422.html (8,500 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] NAQP and Emergency Frequencies (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:04:31 EST
All; Just a final reminder to be particularly aware of the emergency frequencies today during NAQP SSB in light of the events in Haiti. See the notice below from the Contest Manager. 73, Al, K0AD **
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00207.html (7,408 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Sprint Practice Slow Thursday (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:24:52 EST
Mike; Not a big deal but the ARRL Web Site says Haiti frequencies , including 7045, are now released for normal operation. 73, Al, K0AD In a message dated 1/27/2010 9:21:49 P.M. Central Standard Time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00318.html (6,842 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] NS Ladder Wk 6 (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:18:58 EST
very tight competition in our E. of Ms. River Div, between N4OGW, N4AF and W9RE, and in West of Ms. River Div between WD0T, N3BB and KZ5D. Get on and help your friends _______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00323.html (7,095 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best call sign letters (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:04:13 EDT
For what it's worth, the only significant problem I have with my own call sign phonetics is that DX stations quite often mistake the ZERO in my call for a TWO on phone It must be some kind of Minneso
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00353.html (7,283 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] In-state stations in QSO Parties... (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:50:16 -0400
I might be missing something here but I certainly don't see anything wrong with rovers simply signing something like K0AD/DAK when they are roving. I have been doing that for years in MNQP. The loggi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00408.html (12,160 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and contesting... (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:36:52 EDT
I consider Field Day more of a radio activity than a contest. I often hear people saying "Field Day is not a contest - it is a operating event." I sort of tire of that statement. To me, "Field Day is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00334.html (8,600 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] NCJ + WRTC bloggers? (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:39:15 EDT
We still plan to set this up on the NCJ site as in the past. I realize we are getting down to the wire. We need some bloggers. If there is anyone out there who is going to WRTC as either a participan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00339.html (7,558 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2010 Blog on NCJ Web Site (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:18:25 EDT
All; It's hard to believe that WRTC 2010 is only a week away! I encourage you all to check out the WRTC 2010 Blog on the National Contest Journal (NCJ) Web Site. So far , we have 11 WRTC 2010 attende
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00039.html (7,413 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Getscores Active for IARU (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:01:39 EDT
Does anyone know if the GetScores Live Scoreboard will be active for IARU? If so, can someone provide a link to the interface for N1MM? 73, Al, K0AD _______________________________________________ CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00118.html (6,549 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:08:36 -0400
I recall this same issue from the RTTY Roundup. If I understand the rules correctly for these ARRL contests, this effectively rules out operating SO2R while using packet. I am hoping that this will b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00192.html (10,376 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC coverage (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:46:51 EDT
not in a specialty publication like the NCJ or only on the web. Have to disagree with you here , Jim. Regardless of where else it is covered, there is plenty of WRTC2010 coverage planned for the Nov/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00242.html (7,180 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] CD Parties (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:44:38 EDT
I don't remember the reason they were stopped but I think, for the most part, the NAQPs have taken their place. As I recall, CD parties happened 4 times a year , though. Most of them were open to ARR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00042.html (7,413 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu