- 1. QSL issues (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Mon Mar 18 15:18:11 1996
- Steve just hates it when guest ops like me come along and log everything... (...in the belief that the log should reflect what actually happened) -- D.R. Evans NQ0I / G4AMJ : devans@lynx.colorado.edu
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00077.html (8,386 bytes)
- 2. Contesting and the Internet? (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Sat Apr 20 10:21:08 1996
- Astounding. But you can link to your next door neighbour, to whom you have loaned a PC for the weekend, and that one is connected to the Net. Right? I'm not sure that any assumptions are safe, given
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00142.html (15,685 bytes)
- 3. Contesting and the Internet? (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Tue Apr 23 10:00:01 1996
- A hearty "I agree". -- D.R. Evans NQ0I / G4AMJ : devans@lynx.colorado.edu al019@freenet.uchsc.edu "Palindor Chronicles" information and extracts: http://spot.colorado.edu/~romigj/drevans.html -- Desi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00158.html (8,737 bytes)
- 4. (Fwd from K0KR via NQ0I) Guywire Anchor Posts (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Wed Apr 24 15:05:54 1996
- The reflector has been rich with valuable commentary on guy anchor posts. For the most part, the comments have been anecdotal, in the vein of "this is what has worked for me." Few comments have been
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00175.html (14,613 bytes)
- 5. RF Exposure limits (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Mon Aug 5 14:17:11 1996
- The obvious action to take is to make the antenna higher. I wonder, though, what one is supposed to do in places where there are strict antenna height limits (welcome to Boulder County, folks)? Will
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00017.html (8,129 bytes)
- 6. RF Exposure Limits (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Thu Aug 8 10:14:38 1996
- wrote: Perzactly. It is N2IC being a realist, at least as far as Boulder County is concerned. -- D.R. Evans NQ0I / G4AMJ : devans@lynx.colorado.edu Active Member, SFWA al019@freenet.uchsc.edu "Palin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00041.html (8,250 bytes)
- 7. FW: ARLB069 FCC Gate 2 update (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Fri Oct 4 09:38:27 1996
- Trust the government to think this one up. How many hams are NOT going to request their $30 back? How much extra time/effort/money is it going to take to process each request instead of simply maili
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00030.html (14,819 bytes)
- 8. Too Early? (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Mon Nov 25 12:09:40 1996
- How disappointing. I saw the title of this thread and assumed it was about people suing other people for getting their vanity apps to the FCC too early. You don't mean this is actually going to be a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00326.html (32,121 bytes)
- 9. CQWW category (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Thu Dec 26 08:48:11 1996
- I ask the following because: 1. The rules in QST are ambiguous; 2. The people I have asked who should know the answer have differed in their opinion. In CQWW, are there High power, Single band, Assis
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-12/msg00116.html (7,995 bytes)
- 10. CQWW category (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Fri Dec 27 09:11:51 1996
- The three answers I have received so far split 2:1 in favor of there being NO single-band assisted. However, the one who said that there are such categories cited an instance in the printed results,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-12/msg00121.html (16,074 bytes)
- 11. (Fwd) Re: CQWW category (score: 1)
- Author: devans@lynx.colorado.edu (D. R. Evans)
- Date: Tue Dec 31 09:15:06 1996
- Hi, Yes, there are single band categories in the: High power, Low power, QRP and Assisted categories. There always have been such categories. Look at any result for the CQWW in CQ magazine. Single b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-12/msg00133.html (19,413 bytes)
- 12. Contests and QSLs (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Tue Feb 22 21:27:58 1994
- I mean well, I really do. Before every major contest I tell myself: "This time I will get all the QSLs out within 30 days." But then... Somehow I have to get all those QSLs to the right places. Prin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-02/msg00075.html (18,589 bytes)
- 13. Why contest? (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Wed Mar 2 16:28:03 1994
- Many people with licenses these days are never exposed. We need to put in more work at encouraging the infection. I dread to think what US participation in CW contests will be like 20 years from now
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-03/msg00002.html (7,389 bytes)
- 14. QSX 7019 (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Wed Mar 9 18:27:17 1994
- Unless things have changed since I left EU, the Region 1 plan is a non-enforceable agreement which does not have the status of law. This is a quite different status from, say, FCC regulations in the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-03/msg00021.html (28,642 bytes)
- 15. Novice Contest (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Sun May 22 16:29:37 1994
- The definition of the "target audience" is a bit vague. The word "beginner" doesn't tell me very much. Do we mean: 1. Someone who has done little contesting; 2. Someone who has a low license class;
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-05/msg00043.html (8,507 bytes)
- 16. CONTESTS (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Tue May 24 16:29:45 1994
- For the first two or three years after I received my US call, I went on in NR and tried to work several novices. NOT ONE of them could copy my callsign; they all, without exception, tried to mangle
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-05/msg00048.html (13,361 bytes)
- 17. WPX rules? (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Fri Jun 3 18:29:23 1994
- Back when I was G4AMJ/W0, the reciprocal rules stated that you had to use the modifier "W". As I recollect, this was not written on the permit itself, but somewhere quite different, like in the over
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00016.html (16,508 bytes)
- 18. Covenants, Restrictions (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Tue Jun 14 19:29:11 1994
- DBS dishes seem to be very common in England these days. I don't believe that their pervasiveness has had any effect on the generally draconian regulations regarding Our (TM) antennas. The diameter
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00039.html (17,332 bytes)
- 19. Covenants, Testrictions (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Tue Jun 14 22:29:40 1994
- Correct. If anyone is able to cajole, force, intimidate, smile nicely or otherwise get a halfway decent antenna when some regulation implies that one should not be allowed, then I have two things to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00040.html (10,040 bytes)
- 20. Beating Peter 1 to death! (score: 1)
- Author: DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu (DEVANS@lynx.colorado.edu)
- Date: Wed Jun 15 17:29:25 1994
- You mean I have to stop doing this? Is it OK if I continue for single-op efforts? Doc NQ0I It certainly is, but you would never believe it from the knee-jerk reaction exhibited by many of the big-gu
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00046.html (12,798 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu