Hi Contesters....I sent this CORRECTION out from AOL over 24 hours ago, but apparently it is lost in AOL-land somewhere. Here it is again. If you got it, sorry for the repost...it never got back to m
Fellow Contesters: Lost logs are a tough problem, and the "solution" cited (to post the logs received onto a web page) sounds good. So good, in fact, that for future CQWW DX contests, that is JUST wh
Dear Contesters: In an effort to "improve" catching logs that may be listed "in the wrong zone or call area," the CQWWCC respectfully requests that you include the portable indicator ON YOUR SUMMARY
<< MORAL TO THE STORY: THERE IS NO PERFECT HIGHT OR ANTENNA- HAVE A BUNCH AND USE THE ONE THAT WORKS BEST AT THE PARTICULAR TIME. >> This is always true! I am always stunned when some "contester" spe
<< Not xactly ..... the REAL moral to the story is: You need 6/6/6/6/6/6/6/6/6/6/6/6/6 and an east coast location to compete nationally! >> Hmmmm? According to everything I've read on here, you would
This message is narrowly directed to those entrants in the CQWW who have traditionally placed in the top ten (or fifteen) in the SOAB High Power and the SOAB Low Power categories for the USA. First,
An open letter from the CQWW Contest Committee NOTE: [You are encouraged to duplicate and repost this message. It may be duplicated in PRINT, and it may be posted to any Web Page. We encourage you to
Hi Contesters... Tnx to SO MANY of you who told me that your Email log submissions were rejected. I have NO IDEA where the server is (it's not "mine") and K3EST is still out of the country. I'll try
Hi Contesters.... All of you who already submitted your log should have received a second message by now ack'ing your log entry. Apparently, all logs were being received okay, but the WRONG MESSAGE w
Hi Contesters... I am still getting numerous inquiries about how to submit your log. Please point your brower to: http://www.affcom.com/cqcontest/howtoeml.htm It has complete information covering all
<< >I haven't seen where the use of packet in assisted Old subject, Ken. It has in some cases. IMHO it SHOULD in ALL CASES given EQUAL operators, stations and propagation. It's only logical. >> Well,
Hi folks.... Got my CQWW 1995 SOABLP SSB plaque in today mail! Yippie! de Doug KR2Q -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting
<< and the most creative use of "super-check partial." >> I never miss an opportunity to bring this up as a topic of discussion. I question the use of "super-check partial" as a tool for contesting.
Hi Guys and Gals.... I think I have all of this stuff solved....how about: Single Op, no packet, 2 radio, 3 tower, wires on 160, yagi's everywhere else, soft chair, no carbo's, no caffeine, Pentium I
Contesters: You can now look up YOURSELF, whether or not your log has been received (Email only) by the CQWW Contest Committee. Point your browser to: http://cqww.com/cqww/logs/ You will see a list o
Hi Contesters: There has some QRM (or QRN) lately about the SSB@CQWW.com site. Here are the FACTS: 1) Everything is working fine 2) It is VERY EASY to use: just Email your log to SSB@CQWW.com 3) You
<< I recall reading in PC Magazine several months ago that cookies do no harm to our computers. They merely store some personalized information that WE entered, that may be called up on future visits
<< It's a shame there is no place for two or three aging contesters to get together at an average home station to enjoy the CQ WW contests. >> Oh come Tom. How can you say this? 2 or 3 aging conteste
<< I am 16, and here's my advice to my fellow hams: Hang in there. Rough it out with the "hard way" equipment. Then, once you get the money to get the "Best Of The Best", you will know how to operate
<< I didn't read the rules before making this post. But I dont think you are required to make sure he logs you correctly. It's just the right thing to do. >> DISCLAIMER: The following statements are