Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:DougKR2Q@aol.com: 129 ]

Total 129 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] SO2R "advantage" myth (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jun 7 15:26:39 2000
Gents: I would like to suggest that in the major DX contests (not the domestic jobs like SS), that all the "extra mults" the SO2R guys are perceived to work (either by the non-SO2R types or by the SO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00163.html (9,130 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] technology-the other perspective (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat Jan 9 08:46:24 1999
Hi Contesters: Well, this is sure an interesting discussion. Having never done an RTTY contest, I will not take any position pro or con. But I can tell you that this seems like a total nightmare for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00008.html (7,359 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] technology-the other perspective (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat Jan 9 08:46:24 1999
Hi Contesters: Well, this is sure an interesting discussion. Having never done an RTTY contest, I will not take any position pro or con. But I can tell you that this seems like a total nightmare for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00034.html (7,339 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Log Checking in General (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sun Mar 7 12:36:59 1999
Hello Contesters: I can't but help wonder why the same discussions seem to take place over and over again about log checking....like there is some sort of difference with each discussion for each dif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00079.html (8,849 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Re NCJ 1999 Contester Hot Picks Editorial (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat Mar 20 05:00:37 1999
This is GREAT STUFF....I L O V E D it... de Doug KR2Q -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com HELLO FRIENDS: I please N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00286.html (7,693 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] WPX then and now (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat Apr 10 14:30:36 1999
Hi all: I don't know exactly how meaningful this is, but I compared my "winning" 1992 wpx ssb effort with my 1999 effort. Both are for SOAB QRP. Here is what I found. 1. QSO's then: 916 QSO's now: 11
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00067.html (7,900 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] new CQWW CD...WOW! (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sun Apr 18 09:32:34 1999
Hello Contesters: Get ready for SUPER GREAT NEWS: I just installed my BRAND NEW CQWWDX CONTEST RESULTS 1948-1997 CD and I am just blown away! This has got to be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00160.html (7,443 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] QRQ code practice (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Mon Apr 19 22:51:58 1999
Hi all.... Last June I accepted a new position and between my new hours and the 2 hour each way commute, I find that I don't get much time on the radio. I'd like to keep my cw going so I'm looking fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00169.html (7,081 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] MRRC Dayton Hospitality Suite (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sun May 2 08:45:22 1999
<< #3858-3860 >> Only TWO kc? With a freq like that, can't be a DX contest! de Doug KR2Q -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00014.html (6,580 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] busted Q's whine whine whine (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat May 8 17:36:44 1999
QAA08839 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/cq-contest-faq.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C Dear Contesters: I see it is once again
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00153.html (14,439 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] RE: Busted Calls (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat May 8 17:38:24 1999
<< A few years ago in the All-Asia contest someone showed up and worked close to 50 stations (at least) using the call 4S7AX. As near as I can find out, there was no legally licensed 4S7AX. (I still
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00155.html (6,707 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] W4AN on super duper (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat May 8 18:02:28 1999
<< I use Super Check Partial. The damned cat is out of the bag on that one. But if all the contest sponsors outlawed it, and K8CC, N6TR, and K1EA removed it from their programs - I believe nearly 100
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00156.html (7,449 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] Guessing or miscopied? (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sat May 8 18:01:14 1999
<< A sudden QSB changes an "N" to an "I", or a "B" to an "H", and is so entered. [snip] This does happen, but not often. [snip] Do these deserve a penalty more than the loss of the contact. I don't t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00157.html (7,599 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] post contest "corrections" (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sun May 9 20:23:59 1999
<< But I do have one question..... I usually make notes during the contest. These notes are to correct verious typos that I see but can't get to with the computer in real time. I have always felt tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00174.html (7,147 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] SCP (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Thu May 13 05:55:43 1999
<< When taking exam for US license in Washington DC I had multiple choice questions which in my opinion is a lot easier. It just allows much more room for guessing. Yet I never thought that the latte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00235.html (7,732 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] RE: Uniques de VE4XT (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Mon May 17 14:20:20 1999
<< I see the net effect being to penalize ops whose skill allows them to encourage non-participants to call. >> This argument sounds good on paper, but it is simply NOT the case. More often than not,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00280.html (6,691 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] WPX Rumination (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Sun May 30 09:55:23 1999
<< No, I fundamentally quit because WPX is boring. I don't think it's anything more than an exercise in run technique. >> AHA! Another candidate for QRP! Take it from me, you will have a tough time m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00320.html (7,104 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Wed Aug 11 22:37:58 1999
<< K*7Y screwed up, HC8A really worked KL7Y. K*7Y sends in a log. KL7Y does not. The log checkers find the KL7Y QSO in the log of HC8A and cross checking erroneously shows that the QSO was with K*7Y.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00095.html (8,316 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Wed Aug 11 22:37:58 1999
<< K*7Y screwed up, HC8A really worked KL7Y. K*7Y sends in a log. KL7Y does not. The log checkers find the KL7Y QSO in the log of HC8A and cross checking erroneously shows that the QSO was with K*7Y.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00356.html (8,271 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] muddying the water (score: 1)
Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (DougKR2Q@aol.com)
Date: Mon Sep 20 12:24:13 1999
Dear Contesters: The time frame is 1969-1970. There is ONE active station from Kerguelen and everyone knows it is FB8XX. The "others" active are FB8WW, YY, and ZZ (see the trend?) FB8XX has an incred
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-09/msg00096.html (7,464 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu