<< Yes, we know who is doing it. No, no one wants to publicly point a finger. >> Why NOT? I have been "invited" to operate at stations with BIG AMPS and I simply will NOT go...even if they do NOT run
<< Hi Doug, just want to agree with your thoughts - first hamfest I ever attended as a young Novice in 1955 I won a 50% discount for a very expensive radio rcvr... like winning a 50% discount on a Bo
<< I have no problems with an operator reviewing his logs before submitting them and making corrections >> In all my years of contesting in the CQWWDX contest, I have ALWAYS understood that post cont
<< Technology has provided users with tape recorders, computers, data bases, and the like. Why in the world would you want to outlaw using them. Why not also outlaw narrow pass-band filters, or high
Dear Contesters: I have certainly read lots of mail on post-contest "sanitizing," "correcting," "fixing typos," etc. It is OBVIOUS that the waters are muddy. Please allow me to clear them up...and re
<< Sure you were. If you had two hours for the test before you had to turn in your sheet and you finished in one hour, you certainly could take the remaining time to go over your answers. In a contes
<< In a PGA event, it ain't over until the score card is signed - after the player has reviewed it to make sure the score for each hole is correct. In league bowling, the score sheet may be corrected
<< I wonder if anyone knows why scores still dropped after UBN Computer checking? For example OF1AF's score was after computer check (UBN file what was available via access code at http://cqww.com )
Sorry for the long 'COPY' below, but it is all relevant. I replied PRIVATELY to this [round two] scenario, but I since it is now PUBLIC, I guess my answer should go public as well. Please see my comm
<< I think the following item appeared in the Beetle Valley Enquirer. >> Dick: I feel your pain.... sic transit glorius contestum de Doug KR2Q -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-cont
<< > What incentive does the runner have to log zero-point QSOs? >> I have had a give and take with Lee about this on a PRIVATE level, but I'd like to share some more thoughts with the group. 1. If y
Anyone wishing to know the CQWW SSB or CW records for a particular country can send a message to <questions@cqww.com>. 73 CQWW Committee -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ A
Hello contesters.... I was asked to forward this message, word for word, to the general reflector. de Doug KR2Q << Dear Contesters, The winners of trophies and certificates in the CQWW are right to e
Hello U of Penn Contesters: I read the recent post on here about the Collegiate Club competition, and it got me to wondering who else went to Univ of Penn. [NOT penn state] I know of: KR2Q (Schl of V
An open letter from the CQWW Contest Committee NOTE: [You are encouraged to duplicate and repost this message. It may be duplicated in PRINT, and it may be posted to any Web Page. We encourage you to
Hi contesters. As for taking "cat naps", you should be aware of this: Some of the CQWWCC members studied WHEN unique, busted, bad, etc. calls occur in log. It was found that the greatest number of er
Hi Contesters... I received this PRIVATE message from N4KG, inquiring about how to submit a coversheet for a monoband log. I thought his question had wide applicability, so I hope Tom doesn't mind if
Roger Dick, 5905 de KR2Q...you're in the log 15 meters @ 2300z! What's wrong with all you other guys? His call is on packet! de Doug -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Admin
Dear Contesters: As the CQWW contest approaches, I urge everyone to check out the NEW RULES and NEW REQUESTED METHOD for submitting logs. The CQWW 1997 RULES can be found at: http://www.affcom.com/cq
Hi contesters.... After the recent post on the reflector, suggesting that readers check out the 1997 CQWW RULES and the comment about DUPLICATE CONTACTS, I received this memo which I felt had wide ap