Mail Archive Search: <+from:ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. retransmitting (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Tue Mar 15 15:13:53 1994; retransmission of unacknowledged message -- attempt #2: Forwarded message: RE: AGC on/off thread......... A number of commenters expressed concern about the potential for hearing damage if AGC was ru; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-03/msg00034.html (11,282 bytes)
2. Single-Multi (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Fri Mar 25 17:25:30 1994; Steve N2IC wrote some observations on the "single-two" style of operating. He concluded that the hardware ante has been raised and might discourage newcomers. This has always been the case with conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-03/msg00063.html (20,439 bytes)
3. winning CQ's (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Mon Apr 4 18:27:53 1994; RE: > k5gn once said "he who calls the most CQs wins" this is still true. John Wilson K4YF (now regrettably a silent key) had a similar but more generic proverb: "If you are not transmitting, you are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-04/msg00007.html (7,816 bytes)
4. Eric wrote this? (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Mon Apr 4 19:24:32 1994; ... and, by the way, it was NOT Eric K3NA who wrote the following... (I'm not sure which Eric it was....) -- K3NA Forwarded message: Ref No: m0pmPd0-0001FsC(a)comtch.iea.com Message Id: <m0pmPd0-0001; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-04/msg00008.html (20,253 bytes)
5. name passing (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Wed Apr 6 13:12:36 1994; quoting an earlier message: Sorry if this all obvious to most people, but as far as I know this rule is unique to the SprINT, and it does make for some interesting analyses later on (as well as openi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-04/msg00012.html (23,833 bytes)
6. K3NA on the road soon (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Thu Apr 7 12:36:46 1994; Hi folks -- I will be heading into Asia on business in the first half of May, under current plans. For certain I will be in Beijing and Seoul, with a good chance of Tokyo and maybe Hong Kong/Taipei.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-04/msg00015.html (8,986 bytes)
7. FD freebie xmtrs (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Tue May 17 12:40:15 1994; Mark -- Sorry, I couldn't send this directly to you because there was no internet address at the end of your message. In general, I think it is time for ARRL to abandon the present free-transmitters; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-05/msg00030.html (7,455 bytes)
8. w6qhs - yagi failures (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Mon Jun 13 12:33:30 1994; Hi Dave -- Sorry, lost the original message with your internet address... My experience has been with KLM KT34XA: 1. bent elements from ice loading: cause: weak point in element design is one foot fr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-06/msg00035.html (15,316 bytes)
9. K3NA survey response (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Wed Jul 13 19:16:38 1994; [I'm posting this to the reflector because I would like to read others unfiltered remarks.] -- Eric K3NA eric.L.scace@adn.sprint.com Hi John -- Here is my survey response. (I'll never remember what I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00034.html (18,504 bytes)
10. W3LPL amplifiers (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Thu Jul 14 20:26:04 1994; The following is first-hand experience. The situation described has been the case at W3LPL since the late 1970s, when I first started operating there (as a single op on phone!). W3LPL has six single-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00044.html (9,963 bytes)
11. marking coax (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Tue Jul 26 20:50:49 1994; Two other ideas: 1. Go to a computer supply store. Buy the sheets of cable labels that can be placed in a printer. Print, write, or type on the cable label. Pull label off and apply to cable. Each la; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00104.html (11,018 bytes)
12. WRTC 1995 #1 (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Thu Aug 4 21:35:59 1994; World Radiosport Team Championship 1995 Information Release #1 NOTE: This Information Release provides preliminary information about the second World Radiosport Team Championship. Planning is in a pr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00015.html (22,938 bytes)
13. N6AA vs K5ZD (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Fri Aug 12 15:59:03 1994; People who are concerned that other operators are logging calls "from the packet spot" instead of listening to what was sent on the air can contribute to a solution. Instead of posting the entire cal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00062.html (14,871 bytes)
14. packet & WRTC teams (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Mon Aug 15 16:51:13 1994; A few questions have been raised about the logic of allowing WRTC-95 competitors to use packet spots. It should be noted that the WRTC-95 competitors are two-man teams, operating in the MULTI-SINGLE; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00067.html (12,110 bytes)
15. WRTC: packet, power (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Tue Aug 16 12:58:44 1994; Hi gang -- I've gotten a modest number of notes about the use of packet for spotting by the WRTC teams. The rules are not cast in concrete, so this issue will be revisited by the Administration on Au; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00076.html (7,638 bytes)
16. physical mail (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Thu Aug 18 17:31:36 1994; Hi everyone -- The WRTC Administration is trying to compile a mailing list of people who edit contest columns in magazines around the world. The purpose of the mailing list is to help get information; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00095.html (7,546 bytes)
17. grounding the neutral (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Thu Aug 25 16:07:39 1994; Eric NV6O mentioned being sure that the neutral from one's electrical power feed was grounded in the box where the surge protector is installed. I would like an explanation of this. I was taught that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00127.html (8,169 bytes)
18. aluminum wire (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Thu Aug 25 16:34:05 1994; It should be noted that many shortwave broadcasting stations have modern open wire transmission lines and antenna arrays made from alumoweld wire/cable. Alumoweld is like copperweld, except that alum; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-08/msg00128.html (16,757 bytes)
19. reply to WRTC comments (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Fri Sep 2 12:58:49 1994; The WRTC Administration would like to thank EVERYONE for their comments on the WRTC proposal. We've gotten a lot of very thoughtful remarks and suggestions and offers to help. It's really been great.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00011.html (15,295 bytes)
20. CQ WW multi-single band changes (score: 1): Author: ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com (ERIC.L.SCACE@adn.sprint.com); Date: Thu Sep 1 18:37:39 1994; Just read OT6T's discussion of using CT9.02 for multi-single. Didn't K3EST say something earlier this year here on Internet, that in the future the 10min rule was going to be enforced as "10 minutes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00018.html (6,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]