- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: <no subject> (score: 1)
- Author: Home.Peter.Casier@wfp.or.ug (Home.Peter.Casier@wfp.or.ug)
- Date: Sat May 8 11:48:54 1999
- "I think this is a strikingly bad idea. (snip) Features such as verifying validity of an entry, 'computing' zones from call prefixes, and other program-provided assistance violates the spirit of "my
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00162.html (8,165 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] CQWW, transcendential (score: 1)
- Author: Home.Peter.Casier@wfp.or.ug (Home.Peter.Casier@wfp.or.ug)
- Date: Wed Oct 28 21:05:48 1998
- For me, this is THE ham radio weekend of the year. Thousands of people filling the waves all with the common fun in mind. Amazing. Old people, young people. Mobiles, people on a deserted islands, on
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-10/msg00035.html (7,879 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Human Rights Group Blasts Proposed Ham (score: 1)
- Author: Home.Peter.Casier@wfp.or.ug (Home.Peter.Casier@wfp.or.ug)
- Date: Wed Nov 4 21:26:59 1998
- In SSB, the last two given when a pileup is really dense, is understandable. Often one can run much faster that way than when all shout their full call. But what I can not understand, is that when I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00069.html (9,381 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu