Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:JBaumgarte@aol.com: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Free Rice in MN QSO party! (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Sat Feb 3 18:16:56 2001
boundary="part1_a.8673e8f.27adeb68_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 10502 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00022.html (7,787 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Free Rice in MN QSO party! (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Sun Feb 4 09:04:39 2001
Very red faced here! Sorry for error. It was, of course, Saturday. Unfortunately I didn't realize my faux pas until the bands sounded awfully quiet at 8 a.m. Sunday! I'm afraid I'll be buying lots of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00025.html (7,006 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] multi band change rule (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue Feb 6 11:00:21 2001
Tim and others, I believe your interpretation is right on the money and I'm glad this came up. As a CAC member, I believe that this is an item that slipped through the cracks. I don't recall any disc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00045.html (8,610 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Dunestar mod. 600 insertion rf loss (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue Feb 20 22:02:20 2001
I find about 10% loss--some bands a bit less. I understand one direction is sometimes less than the other, but have not tried to switch cables around. They are VERY effective, but there is this loss.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00126.html (7,476 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] re: Casual contesters... (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Mon Mar 19 10:35:50 2001
<< We have done a similar analysis on the 6Y4A, 6Y2A, 4M7X logs (which were all M/M events, generating around 16-18,000 QSOs each CQ WW CW). Kenny, Interesting comments. I'm curious how many 6 bander
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00261.html (8,731 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Reality check for contesters (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:45:33 2001
I am of the opinion that many who participate in this great reflector do so because they like to write not contest! If you're serious about amateur radio, how can you not support the ARRL? If you're
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00287.html (7,303 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Y2K NAQP Announcement! (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jan 5 11:52:43 2000
<< Second, remember that several updates/changes were made to the NAQP Rules effective with the 2000 contests. MOST IMPORTANTLY, the maximum transmitter power level has been reduced to 100 Watts and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-01/msg00011.html (7,421 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] New SS Category Proposal (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Thu Mar 16 15:12:07 2000
<< Tennessee is not unique with this limitation. How about you other states out there that comprise a whole section, but the 175 mile circle catches only a handful of active contesters?? OK MI OH KY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00232.html (8,931 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Log checking--report of collateral damage? (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Mon Mar 8 17:47:31 1999
In response to W2CE's comments Bob, I'm really sorry to see you go as I (we) all appreciate the many part timers that make the contests successful. If you read all the postings on this, however, you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00129.html (8,897 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Second radio tri-band antenna options? (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed Apr 7 13:49:17 1999
Dan, I believe you will have problems with the 2nd receiver! My experience with antennas on the same tower (in my case) is that you will need band pass filters on both radios. I believe it is the pri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00043.html (7,480 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue May 4 13:07:36 1999
Aw, Dave, many of these can really be interesting and fun! I think more and more state groups are getting serious about making these work, by diligently working on getting most of their counties on t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00032.html (8,988 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] SS SOA comment from CAC member (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Sun Aug 1 16:19:20 1999
<< That's not the point of SOA in SS. The point is for all the small-medium pistols who want to get a Clean Sweep, and the mug, broom, t-shirt, or whatever goes with it, and who also want to be hones
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00003.html (8,470 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] SS SOA comment from CAC member (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Sun Aug 1 16:19:20 1999
<< That's not the point of SOA in SS. The point is for all the small-medium pistols who want to get a Clean Sweep, and the mug, broom, t-shirt, or whatever goes with it, and who also want to be hones
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00264.html (8,461 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] K5MM - Silent Key (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Mon Dec 21 12:29:32 1998
Really sad to hear about our old friend, Dale Jones. Gator was correct, Dale's call in CA was W6GEN--that's the time I got to know him. He was there working for General Dynamics as an RF Design engin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00178.html (8,369 bytes)

15. Pointing a stack different headings (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Mon Feb 26 20:20:58 1996
John, I very much enjoyed (and appreciated) your comments on this issue. Let me add another little hooker! I have two C3 in a phased stack--both rotatable individually--at 53 and 110'. Because of guy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00731.html (7,722 bytes)

16. Stacking TH7's (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue Apr 16 00:24:56 1996
Although there have been several good responses to AA8U's inquiry about this, I haven't seen anything about sidemounting AND ROTATING TH7's in a stack. I had good luck with a pair of TH7's on Rohn 55
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00116.html (8,940 bytes)

17. elevated guy posts (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue Apr 23 22:10:23 1996
Lots of interesting threads on this--everyone's situation unique! I have 110' Rohn 55 in a fairly tight location--two guy points only 53' from the tower. I needed to clear a garage and (obviously) mo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00162.html (16,354 bytes)

18. Loose guages on sale! (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue Apr 30 00:06:59 1996
While paging through an "E & B Marine" catalogue, I happened upon the now famous "Loose Tension Guage" for $39.99 plus shipping. The part number for the 3/16" to 9/32" one which we've all been talkin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00216.html (14,774 bytes)

19. balloon verticals (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue Aug 13 16:25:13 1996
Decided to try this for 160 this season, but have a few questions for anyone who might have tried one. Picked up some neat "hollow" wire with kevlar liner at Dayton--very light, but #14 size. Have th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00080.html (12,531 bytes)

20. Multi - Single Op / Single Band ?? (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue Nov 12 11:28:16 1996
Jon, Several years ago Mike, N0BSH and I did, as you say, a multi/single op / single band CQWW from W0AIH. Mike did 10 and I did 15. The contest folks said no! Mike's score was in the top 3 or so, mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-11/msg00183.html (11,163 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu