- 1. Captive rovers? Cheating? Nah... (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Thu Jan 25 05:40:47 1996
- What in the heck are you blabbering on about???? I live a major city and have never had to pad my log, run illegal power or any of the other blather you think happens. I don't know how they work cont
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-01/msg00030.html (26,432 bytes)
- 2. Soliciting Contest QSOs on Packet (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Sun Feb 25 23:10:16 1996
- I believe the intent of the rules is to W1XYZ from calling SU2MT using the ol' AT&T landline or to stop other people from "assisting" W1XYZ by spotting multipliers for her. Spotting yourself on packe
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00703.html (7,109 bytes)
- 3. A contester is born... (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Apr 3 03:08:22 1996
- If there were no personal messages relayed on behalf of a "third party," how the devil do the third party agreements, or lack thereof, come into play in this situation??? GO FOR IT, TAD!! KEEP ON GE
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00022.html (54,526 bytes)
- 4. other usergroups (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Fri Apr 26 12:07:17 1996
- There is even a 10-10 garbage producer.. er... um... I mean reflector: Request to: listserv@lehigh.edu Jeff N6RVZ I do this too and if it weren't for the cost of ground rods and the pain of bonding t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00189.html (9,556 bytes)
- 5. RE "I'll be on so work me" syndrome (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Sun May 28 01:47:17 1995
- I would rather have my mailbox flooded by those messages than the constant blather about crummy operators or the mega bytes dedicated to the recent CQ covers! de Jeff, N6RVZ jgellerrvz@aol.com
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-05/msg00026.html (6,511 bytes)
- 6. RE 'What be this WPX?' (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Thu Jun 1 11:09:55 1995
- ARRRRGH Matey Gordon! This WPX contest be one the finest contests ever concocted by the folks in the amateur radio... W=World PX=Prefix (i.e. N6, VA2, OT5, 4X6, HS7, WQ6, WB200, UN7...) The idea of t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-06/msg00002.html (7,689 bytes)
- 7. RE Re: RE 'What be this WPX?' (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Fri Jun 2 18:14:05 1995
- Single Op = 36 hours!!!!!!!!!! Multi Op = 48 hours!!!!!!!!!!! FFFFFFFFFF YY YY IIIIIIIIII FF YY YY II FF YY YY II FF YY YY II FFFFFFFF YY YY II FF YYYY II FF YY II FF YY II FF YY II FF YY II FF YY I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-06/msg00016.html (10,885 bytes)
- 8. 160m & math (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Thu Nov 23 15:24:44 1995
- and Waldemar, DL7ANQ replied: It really "hertz" to know that EXTRA-CLASS hams can't do simple mathematics. This could be the reason those Pentiums don't work: *We can't add or subtract simple two di
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-11/msg00145.html (18,410 bytes)
- 9. SS rules in QST ??? (score: 1)
- Author: JGellerRVZ@aol.com (JGellerRVZ@aol.com)
- Date: Sat Nov 25 03:07:38 1995
- N3KKM queries: Well they must update them at least 10 days before the contest. I pulled the 160M contest rules and summary sheet on 23NOV95 it has the correct dates (I got the two responses before al
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-11/msg00152.html (11,257 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu