Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Jimk8mr@aol.com: 400 ]

Total 400 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [CQ-Contest] No more JAs (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:31:18 EDT
Japan has to be one of the toughest places in the world to contest from. (OK, at least one of the toughest mid latitude locations). It is about 7 time zones from Europe, 10 from the USA, with most of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00620.html (9,234 bytes)

162. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:12:44 EDT
I think it is quite reasonable that for any remote station to count for the club competition that the remote location would have to qualify as if it were manned. So a W6 cannot get NCCC credit for re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00637.html (10,424 bytes)

163. [CQ-Contest] K8MR PDA Results (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:23:03 EDT
K8MR PDA Contest: 0 + j200 qsos 0 + j100 mults -20000 claimed score Time: ????? I didn't really make any qsos, but somehow I kept imagining that I was operating in the PDA, so I guess that's how I en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00045.html (6,572 bytes)

164. Re: [CQ-Contest] station tables (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:24:51 EDT
Does anyone use keyboard/mouse trays? While I like them for general computer use somehow they don't seem to fit in the radio setup. Unless the desk is very shallow, or the radio is pulled near the fr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00082.html (8,965 bytes)

165. [CQ-Contest] 2006 Ohio QSO Party Results (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:14:58 EDT
The results of the 2006 Ohio QSO Party are now posted at the OQP web site, http://www.oqp.us Congratulations to winners: K8MP Ohio SO N8OT Ohio SO LP N8IE Ohio SO QRP K8MAD Ohio Multiop K8BB Ohio Mob
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00154.html (7,391 bytes)

166. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:37:46 EDT
Would it not make more sense to specify the area (sq km, etc) to be included? So that one does not get crazy shapes, you could impose limits on the geometry (circles, quadrilaterals, maybe even a hex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00281.html (7,906 bytes)

167. [CQ-Contest] Circles and the Mad River Radio Club (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:32:45 EDT
The circle, and specifically a 175 mile radius circle, came about in the mid 1970's as a way to disallow a new "Mad River Radio Club" in Ohio/Indiana/Michigan/Western Pennsylvania. 175 miles was smal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00404.html (9,345 bytes)

168. Re: [CQ-Contest] send but don't log CUT NUMBERS (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:40:42 EDT
How about a simple rule: When sending numbers that convey no information, go ahead and use cut numbers. For example, 5NN, T for leading zeros, CQ zones where you know the zone from the callsign. For
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00108.html (7,448 bytes)

169. Re: [CQ-Contest] remember this? Russian Woodpecker (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:17:48 EDT
Was perhaps the FT-1000MP deliberately designed with a very short CW rise/fall time to increase its CW bandwidth, thereby making its Woodpecker jamming more efficient? 73 - Jim K8MR ** See what's fre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00188.html (8,336 bytes)

170. [CQ-Contest] Noise Canceling Headphones (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:40:27 EDT
An interesting review of noise canceling headphones in today's New York Times: _http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/technology/14pogue.html?pagewanted=2&ei=508 7%0A&em&en=445a2e969d7142d2&ex=1181966400
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00258.html (7,398 bytes)

171. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:41:57 EDT
Is my opinion that the intention of this rule is to avoid someone taking advantage of having several antennas in different areas so separated that said antennas would have different propagation condx
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00484.html (9,931 bytes)

172. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW and 0 pointers (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:29:17 EDT
Zone 4: K9NS, K3LR Bzzzt. LR is in Zone 5. You lose the zone but keep the country as you probably worked other Ws for needed zones. :-) But you can see zone 4 from up on his towers. You probably don'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00141.html (8,506 bytes)

173. Re: [CQ-Contest] 0 points and "Leveling the playing field" (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:44:49 EDT
For what purpose? To supposedly "level the playing field"...which it will actually not do. The latter is a myth that has yet to be achieved, even in WRTC. Isn't it time to stop using the term and del
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00174.html (8,487 bytes)

174. Re: [CQ-Contest] 0 points and "Leveling the playing field" (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:02:18 EDT
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The purpose of "leveling the playing field" is to increase competition between participants. In radio contesting it can never be made perfectly level although WR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00207.html (8,777 bytes)

175. Re: [CQ-Contest] Please DO SOMETHING! (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:52:49 EDT
I mean, how is it possible for a single op, single mode, to work only 9 mults less than the best of all the Multi Single stations (in terms of mults). -- It is possible because of the 10 minute rule
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00273.html (7,788 bytes)

176. [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party - This Saturday! (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:19:32 EDT
The 2007 Ohio QSO Party will be this Saturday, August 25, from 1600z to 0400z August 26. That's noon to midnight, EDT. Two changes for 2007: A plaque will be awarded for top out of state station from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00178.html (7,049 bytes)

177. [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party - Saturday (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:00:20 EDT
A fact you may not have noticed with the recent weather in much of the country: fall is coming, soon. Which means it's time to dust off those radios, check out those antennas, and have some fun this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00235.html (8,014 bytes)

178. [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party - Today! (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:44:53 EDT
The Ohio QSO Party is today (Saturday), starting at 1600z. 80 through 10 meters, exchange is qso number/qth, multipliers by mode. Suggested frequencies up 45 khz on CW, and 3825, 7200, 14250, 21300,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00246.html (7,076 bytes)

179. Re: [CQ-Contest] DigiFest - new digital contest with on-line scores (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:29:37 EDT
DIGIFEST RULES 2007 1. Date and time: I Period 04:00 UTC - 12:00 Saturday 3 Nov 2007 II Period 20:00 UTC - 04:00 Saturday 3 Nov 2007 III Period 12:00 UTC - 20:00 Sunday 4 Nov 2007 (1-th full weekend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00219.html (8,028 bytes)

180. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:07:36 EDT
or older than TQP. Of course, RTTY is the fastest growing contest mode so it is inevitable than bandwidth needs will grow even if there was no overlap originally. This problem is just another case of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00014.html (9,826 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu