Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Jimk8mr@aol.com: 400 ]

Total 400 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:13:37 EDT
Equipment without an operator is not a "station." Similarly, an operator without equipment is not a "station" When the rules say that all parts of the station must be within a 500 meter circle, that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00428.html (10,321 bytes)

202. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:22:01 EDT
The potential of using multiple remote locations is a valid concern and one that contest sponsors need to make sure is prohibited and communicated to the contest community through rules clarification
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00429.html (9,518 bytes)

203. [CQ-Contest] Multiple Locations, Remote or otherwise (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:17:25 EDT
What is the problem with using multiple remote locations? Do you operate the same call from multiple stations during a contest or do you use varying callsigns at these different locations? 73 -- Paul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00433.html (8,119 bytes)

204. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Great 30 hour WPX Debate (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:45:11 EDT
A few comments, even though I don't really have a dog in this fight. I don't seriously operate WPX. I think chasing prefixes is dumb. Once upon a time it made sense, when they reflected geography and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00622.html (16,073 bytes)

205. [CQ-Contest] 2007 Ohio QSO Party Results (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:56:10 EDT
The results of the 2007 Ohio QSO Party are now posted at the OQP website, www.oqp.us Congratulations to plaque winners: Ohio: N8VW Single Operator K8FH SO Low Power K8MP SO SSB N8IE QRP W8VND Multi O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00645.html (7,519 bytes)

206. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:02:34 EDT
Perhaps, then, casual contesters (I being one) should start to foul the system by giving honest reports. I certainly will do this in every contest I play around in, in the future. Inspired by this th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00756.html (9,520 bytes)

207. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:12:46 EDT
In my mind it is cheating only if a competitive advantage is gained, and I don't buy the idea that one was gained by not saying "fie-nie" before every qso number. If 4O3A (or anybody else) says "kilo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00786.html (8,514 bytes)

208. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL info (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:02:32 EDT
(1) If I have worked a station during another QSO/contest, and I work him again in another contest, do I send another QSL card, if not, how to advise that QSO station of another contact? -- Send him
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00812.html (9,426 bytes)

209. Re: [CQ-Contest] 59 - Just do it (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:26:31 EDT
My head is about to explode! This topic is worse than the unassisted Skimmer thread. == Perhaps we can discuss how skimmers can be used by unassisted operators to detect who is sending or not sending
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00058.html (7,633 bytes)

210. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: DAYTON YELLOW BARRELS REPORT (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:39:27 EDT
Only four weeks to Dayton. Here is an alert passed along by the Ohio ARRL Section Manager. From the web site listed, it appears that there is major construction on I-75 between downtown Dayton and th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00228.html (8,055 bytes)

211. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:26:09 EDT
Yes, I realize that guys using code readers do not pass the "your own ears" requirement. Same for RTTY. Open to suggestion on how to word this better. Perhaps something like, "by ear, or electronic d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00308.html (9,951 bytes)

212. Re: [CQ-Contest] FQP 40 SSB Mobile Window and Activity (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:30:42 EDT
A good move. First: moving the frequency lower makes it easier to get a mobile antenna to tune at both CW and SSB. Second: In the Michigan QSO Party last weekend, OM2VL was moving me from 40 CW to SS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00393.html (8,689 bytes)

213. Re: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:06:07 EDT
I am not complaining as I like CW contests and just tolerate SSB contests, but why is this? It seems that SSB would be easier to run while mobile. SSB is much harder to run while mobile. A moderately
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00522.html (8,616 bytes)

214. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer" are there? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:00:12 EDT
I am starting to agree with those who think the time has come to send in an audio file (or CD) along with your log. == I disagree that an audio file should be required. I do believe that an audio fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00569.html (7,853 bytes)

215. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many more creative subjects using "skimmer"are there? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:39:36 EDT
I disagree that an audio file should be required. == What is your rationale, Jim? +++++++++++++++++++ I've got enough to be thinking about when operating a contest, without having to be concerned tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00583.html (7,803 bytes)

216. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Accomodations (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 09:02:32 EDT
My Dayton traveling partner has been forced to delay his trip until Friday. I have a room at the Crowne Plaza for Wednesday night. If anyone needs a space for the night, I have one available. Or if y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00008.html (6,924 bytes)

217. [CQ-Contest] Software for Multiple Contests (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 16:10:07 EDT
The problem of logging software handling more than one contest at a time is not limited to state QSO Parties. The best example of this is probably the second weekend in September, when there is the W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00189.html (9,284 bytes)

218. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers etc (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:20:13 EDT
I don't think Skimmers will attract any new contesters. Contesting will remain a test of running. Skimmers will just make it easier for experienced contesters to do even more running, while waiting f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00059.html (8,331 bytes)

219. Re: [CQ-Contest] Playing Chess (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:45:09 EDT
Although I'm not aware of any confirmed cheating episodes, the American Contract Bridge League recently decided to prohibit the possession (not just the use) of cell phones and other personal communi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00210.html (7,955 bytes)

220. [CQ-Contest] CQ Magazine Contesting Column Error - Wrong Dates (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:05:29 EDT
The Calendar of Events in the August 2008 CQ Magazine (page 96) erroneously lists the Ohio QSO Party as being on August 30-31. It is actually on Saturday, August 23, or 1600z August 23 to 0400z Augus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00297.html (7,670 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu