Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Jimk8mr@aol.com: 400 ]

Total 400 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [CQ-Contest] What contributes to your score the most? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:54:53 EST
Hi Scott, I'm not clear if you are using one radio, or two. With a tribander stack I suspect one. Having a second radio will help, though not so much in the sense that the really good guys can run on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00141.html (8,833 bytes)

322. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Question (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:30:20 EST
The rules don't specify the amount of band changes so you can change bands as much and as often you like. NOT SO!!! 2.3.1. Multioperator, Single Transmitter: Stations are allowed only one transmitted
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00219.html (8,417 bytes)

323. Re: [CQ-Contest] Side Effects (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:56:19 EST
The couple's contest status would depend on their marital status. If they aren't married, then by definition they're Multi - Single. 73 - Jim K8MR In a message dated 3/4/2011 3:49:35 P.M. Eastern Sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00071.html (7,752 bytes)

324. [CQ-Contest] 2010 Ohio QSO Party Results Now Available (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:01:53 EDT
The results of the 2010 Ohio QSO Party are now available at _www.ohqp.org_ (http://www.ohqp.org) Congratulations to the category winners: Ohio: K8O (K2KW) SO Hi Power K8BL SO Low Power N8Q (N8XX) SO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00125.html (7,904 bytes)

325. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 Ohio QSO Party Results Now Available (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:54:18 EDT
And also congratulations to our favorite Wyoming guy, KO7X, who won the Single Op - Mountain/Pacific Time Zone plaque! The results of the 2010 Ohio QSO Party are now available at _www.ohqp.org_ (http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00126.html (7,456 bytes)

326. [CQ-Contest] An Operating Tip (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:00:43 EDT
If you follow the CQ-Contest Reflector to discuss cut numbers, the pros or cons of packet spotting and skimmers, or the inequities of the CQWWDXC scoring system, feel free to press <delete> now. Last
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00175.html (8,174 bytes)

327. Re: [CQ-Contest] Grid Square is the coolest exchange ever, after Sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:37:00 EDT
And grid squares are really fun when you use cut numbers! 73 - Jim K8MR in ENNA (Just kidding!!!) In a message dated 6/14/2011 12:00:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jpescatore@aol.com writes: I realiz
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00062.html (7,636 bytes)

328. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on Proposed Changes to ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:39:18 EDT
What are the proposed changes? 73 - Jim K8MR In a message dated 6/18/2011 6:07:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, aa3b.bud@gmail.com writes: Dear Dick, I hope this finds you well. The purpose of this ema
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00087.html (8,717 bytes)

329. Re: [CQ-Contest] K8A (KH8 American Samoa) CQWWCW 2011 - ops wanted - W4PA (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:08:31 EDT
I think the dupe rate at K8AZ just went up to about five percent :>) 73 - Jim K8MR (one of the regulars at K8AZ, in Zone 4) In a message dated 6/21/2011 10:20:43 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, w4pa@yaho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00136.html (7,132 bytes)

330. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the Playing Field (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:37:40 EDT
With the wonders of computerized scoring, the WorldWideWeb, and electronic publishing, there is no reason contest scores could not be computed via one or more additional algorithms. Keep the existing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00156.html (9,726 bytes)

331. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: More ARRL DX Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:15:20 EDT
I've long thought that logging programs should include an output that triggers an M&M dispenser for each new multiplier, 100K point barrier, full hour of operating without off times, etc. If rewards
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00251.html (8,632 bytes)

332. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:08:32 EDT
You are closing in on a good idea on how to score DX contests, though I'd prefer to whittle the spread down to about a 3:1 ratio. Unfortunately you are talking about the wrong DX contest. Distance sc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00282.html (8,557 bytes)

333. Re: [CQ-Contest] New VHF Super Partial Check Database Release for July VHF Co... (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:13:19 EDT
My philosophy is that it is best to copy the call and the information that the guy sends. See you on the air in the CQ VHF Contest, where I'll be sending my call and information many times. 73 - Jim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00131.html (7,227 bytes)

334. [CQ-Contest] Combining Contests (score: 1)
Author: jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:02:50 -0400
Yes, FQP and Dayton traded weekends. The reason not to have combined qso parties is that in most cases mobile activity makes these events. CA not so much, but very much in FL and GA. Many mobiles do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00219.html (11,031 bytes)

335. [CQ-Contest] CQ Toronto (score: 1)
Author: jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:33:08 -0400
I hope this gets moderated in time to be of use. I am in Toronto for the week, playing in the North American Bridge Championship tournament. Taking a night off from cards tonight (Monday), any contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00224.html (6,717 bytes)

336. Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 23:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
What's the big deal? We all know that we all make mistakes. No need to keep that private. It's like hanging out on a nude beach. Unless your UBN is much, much bigger than everyone else's, nobody will
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00079.html (8,507 bytes)

337. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:04:46 -0400 (EDT)
I can't speak for why the Contest Committee did it, but I see one very good reason to have done so: There is only so much spectrum available for us. In contests it is much less than we would like to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00143.html (9,579 bytes)

338. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:10:59 -0400 (EDT)
Because much of the time only one band is really open and useful. Think 20 meters when the solar flux is at 70. Also because I don't think many SO guys can defend two run frequencies at one time. Two
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00159.html (8,919 bytes)

339. [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party - Saturday! (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:04:17 -0400 (EDT)
A reminder that tomorrow, Saturday, is the Ohio QSO Party, from 1600z to 0400z Sunday. We have great activity lined up this year. Planned activity by fixed stations is listed for 80 of Ohio's 88 coun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00244.html (7,799 bytes)

340. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:03:50 -0500 (EST)
I am throwing this out there for comment. In SS, I worked a number of ops who did not send their callsign as part of the exchange. I found this to be very frustrating for several reasons, namely (1)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00081.html (9,493 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu