Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS Multi-Single Tips (score: 1)
Author: "John Boudreau" <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:14:54 -0700
This will be our first attempt at a multi-single in Sweepstakes. We've got the tx interlock in place between the two stations but would like some tips on what the best way to operate would be. One st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00102.html (7,335 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] 3V8BB in WPX SSB (score: 1)
Author: "John Boudreau" <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:24:02 -0600
Does anyone know who was operating at 3V8BB for WPX SSB? I thought it might be YT1AD but I see he has a log submitted for SOSB80. No entry for 3V8BB and no info at any of the usual sources... 73 John
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00312.html (6,612 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest logging question: PE and PEI (score: 1)
Author: "John Boudreau" <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:38:01 -0700
I take the list of states and provinces in section 5 of the rules as the 'official' position on abbreviations so I was sending NWT all weekend instead of the more normal and expedient NT. Sounded lik
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00152.html (10,583 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: John Boudreau <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:56:47 +0000
I've been following this thread with interest but I strongly feel there seems to be a basic misconception about amateur radio contesting in general and that has to do with the issue of "fairness". Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00062.html (12,013 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] W/VE contacts from W/VE in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: John Boudreau <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:27:56 +0000
Being from a somewhat rare call area I literally have to hide outside the US phone bands or I get swamped with W/VE stations calling me. I'm always shocked at how many ops still call even if they're
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00028.html (10,523 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1)
Author: John Boudreau <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:28:37 +0000
Looking at the CQ WW online database activity trend http://www.cqww.com/stats.htm shows a marked increase in participation in both modes over the last 7 or 8 years. Would anyone care to speculate wha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00259.html (8,789 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Yukon plans for SS CW? (score: 1)
Author: John Boudreau <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:59:06 +0000
I haven't heard of anyone in the Yukon that will be on this weekend although VY1EI is usually around for SS. 73 John VE8EV Can anyone share with the list Yukon calls that will likely be active in SS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00362.html (8,262 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] A comment from SS (score: 1)
Author: John Boudreau <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:45:03 +0000
I actually worked one more VA than MDC (who were tied with IL for 2nd most popular section). 73 John VE8EV http://ve8ev.blogspot.com ________________________________________ From: CQ-Contest [cq-cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00122.html (9,046 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: John Boudreau <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 01:16:44 +0000
I'd like to throw out the suggestion that everyone in an "Assisted" category gets "x" number of self-spots per contest. It then becomes an interesting strategic decision when and where to use your fe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00219.html (9,092 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu