Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K0LUZ@topsusa.com: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [CQ-Contest] Improper packet spotting? (score: 1)
Author: "K0LUZ" <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:35:57 -0500
Hi No doubt not because it wasn't available, but you simply didn't try to get a zone 5 in USA until you took an inventory of what you still needed. Packet would help you to the tune of about 16.3 sec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00056.html (9,970 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] possible error on my part (score: 1)
Author: K0LUZ@topsusa.com (K0LUZ)
Date: Tue Jul 23 16:24:43 2002
Believe I saw that that issue was decided by a voice vote. Therefore all can claim they voted for keeping data in QST. Sounds like the votes taken in Congress when they are raising their salaries. Re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00352.html (7,207 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1)
Author: K0LUZ@topsusa.com (K0LUZ)
Date: Wed Jul 24 12:50:51 2002
In a sense, this is one positive for promoting more contest activity because now the non-member who participates in an ARRL contest can see his score published on the Internet. As a non-member and no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00396.html (9,446 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight [was:UBN/Log disclosure...] (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:12:34 -0400
This was a discussion I was all excited about a year ago and it was discussed here with the exception that it was not tied to cheating in packet. There are a few of us who would like to see contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00173.html (12,223 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another way to look at "daylight" (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:52:18 -0400
If we are referring to live time posting during the contest, both types of people can be accommodated. If you're the type that does wants to push himself/herself to do as well as you can and don't wa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00189.html (8,849 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live audio during WW Phone (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:36:04 -0400
This interpretation is really extreme. And to make it even worse, he goes on and on and on......... So............. What are you going to do with the information? Can you work the stations on the sam
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00545.html (11,887 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] I Caused the NYC Blackout 40 Years Ago Today (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:35:47 -0500
Therefore expect a bill for about 978 million in a few days now that we have your admission! 73 Red K0LUZ --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00374.html (10,067 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reporting Jammers to the FCC (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:29:44 -0500
Has the OO program improved?? Who is training and certifying OOs?? In a previous life, (in other words - long long ago), I was appointed an OO via the ARRL. What this meant was I received a stack of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00175.html (10,816 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:16:48 -0500
Clap clap clap clap clap Way to go Mike, my sentiments exactly. Merry Christmas Red K0LUZ Thank you very much for your opinion Mike. You have hi-lited the problem very well. The rule of the land toda
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00378.html (13,889 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] FQP Evaluation. (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:57:36 -0400
The Florida Mobile crew of K4OJ (N4KM and K0LUZ) who went approximately 1200 miles during last weekends Florida QSO Party would appreciate some insight from stations outside Florida on the operations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00236.html (7,760 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:45:34 -0500
I'm going to stay out of this fray since I plan on working SS CW this weekend and don't want to make anyone mad so that they don't work me during the test. You'll probably find me at about 7.065 + or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00737.html (12,811 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check of 00, a disadvantage? (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:00:02 -0500
My only problem with the 00, 01, 02, etc. checks were that I would absent mindedly treat the 0 as a leading zero and not type it in the log thus causing the qso to not save because of an error in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00294.html (10,427 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:33:30 -0500
Although propagation today seems to be poor for the 9A contest, I checked out the rules and lo and behold it states "All stations are allowed to use the spots from DX packet Cluster." Now doesn't tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00405.html (16,819 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get Rid of the Assisted Category (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:11:39 -0500
While I understand where Dave is coming from, I would like to look at it from a different perspective. Let it be said that I would never remove myself from a contest because I disagreed with a rule s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00427.html (13,873 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:57:51 -0500
Now I believe I understand Tree. Is this something like the technology of SO2R?? Since contest rules do not create a new category for SO2R and forced the top operators to adopt it, do you think it m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00474.html (8,354 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO vs. SOA Scores (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:46:52 -0500
Well said George. If the major criteria is that you have the contest be a "lonely vigil" (tongue in check - whoa -- easy now -- whoa) otherwise defined as Unassisted, then operators using telnet or p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00513.html (18,109 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] What happens when you spot (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:01:34 -0500
will want to show off that they found the Tree, this is because software I use to spot (DXBase, N1MM) read the frequencies off my radio and post both frequencies in the spot. But I think I have a so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00515.html (7,890 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet (score: 1)
Author: "k0luz" <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:09:36 -0500
Reminded me of "shave and a haircut" -- "two bits" EE5E - "Two Bits" 73 Red K0LUZ Heehee - EE5E was a real callsign. I got a list of expected operations before the contest and that one was on the lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00257.html (9,431 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] J7zeroJ Spots (score: 1)
Author: "k0luz" <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:42:28 -0500
I believe the major problem is the bandmap on telnets and fonts that make the 0 and o look almost the same. I worked you guys a couple of times by accident thinking I hadn't worked you on that band y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00357.html (11,092 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu