Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K4BAI@worldnet.att.net: 240 ]

Total 240 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut # (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:03:46 -0400
I find the letter O acceptable for zero if the signal is loud. If the signal is weak, I am worried whether I missed two dits in a 2 or an 8. Since we can't know for sure if we are loud or not, I sugg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00354.html (7,143 bytes)

182. Re: [CQ-Contest] tech challenge - SAY WHAT? (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:13:32 -0400
The exchange in CD parties did not contain a serial number. Just appointment (ORS, OO, etc) and ARRL section. Steve must have been thinking of California QSO party or more likely ARRL SS. 73, John, K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00371.html (8,336 bytes)

183. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circles (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:43:22 -0400
Dave: Your explanation may be reasonable until you consider that for CQ WW DX and ARRL DX, at least, you can count an expedition to another part of the world as part of your club aggregate score. Whe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00394.html (7,119 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut # (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:19:45 -0400
The final death of "real" signal reports in contests is, in my opinion, due to the very popular early contest logging programs that had no provision to record a sent RST other than "599." Both NA and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00013.html (9,556 bytes)

185. [CQ-Contest] Announcement Summer FISTS Sprint (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:53:36 -0400
To all FISTS members and others who might join in the FISTS Summer Sprint. The time and date have been changed. It will be Friday, July 13 from 8 PM to 12 midnight EDT, 7 to 11 PM, CDT, and Saturday,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00028.html (7,526 bytes)

186. [CQ-Contest] 599 Signal Reports (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:53:52 -0400
I am betraying my age now, but at least into the early 1970s, the late W4ML issued a "599 Certificate" to any ham who could prove receipt of a "599" signal report from each of the six continents. I h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00036.html (6,924 bytes)

187. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:09:21 -0400
While we are on cut numbers, I'd (again) like to plead for hams to stop sending "J" for "1." That is fairly common among second tier European contesters. Some even have their computers set to send "J
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00068.html (7,224 bytes)

188. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ic 706 Mark 11 and Writelog for NAQP CW (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:23:40 -0400
In N7MAL's message, I'm sure the "some W1" is Jack, W1WEF. I am pretty sure he still sells the interfaces. I bought one for the COM port and one for the LPT port from him a few years ago at Dayton. 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00028.html (12,006 bytes)

189. Re: [CQ-Contest] [dx-list] CQ Zone question (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:10:18 -0400
I worked VE2XB/VY0 on 20M CW Monay morning about 12 or 13Z. From his QRZ.COM listing, it seems that he makes frequent trips to northern VE2. Maybe this has recently expanded into VY0 land. 73, John,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00079.html (8,395 bytes)

190. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:43:27 -0400
There was once a four-land QSO party. It was never very successful and disappeared at or about the time that its organizer, W4OMW, died. Every fourth area state has a fairly successful QSO party each
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00095.html (7,872 bytes)

191. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefixes in WPX (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:24:46 -0500
Don: I've always understood that the requirement of Canadian stations in the US and US stations in Canada to sign the portable designator at the end of the call was because it was required in a treat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00041.html (7,537 bytes)

192. Re: [CQ-Contest] DOs and DONTs of QSLing (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:13:57 -0500
I agree with George and would add, please do not fold a return envelope so that it will be cut by a letter opener used on the flap side of the envelope. If you must fold the envelope, put the fold on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00058.html (7,248 bytes)

193. [CQ-Contest] QSLs (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:35:20 -0500
Dennis: Your remark about signing across the label or using a rubber stamp reminds me of an experience I had a few years ago. (BTW, I use a round "confirmed by K4BAI" stamp that is reinkable and does
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00224.html (7,648 bytes)

194. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] DUMB CUT NUMBER (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:46:53 -0500
I noticed that the PY5/OK station who was sending his power as "AK" the first day was sending only "K" the second day. I think the message finally got through! 73, John, K4BAI. ______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00341.html (7,413 bytes)

195. [CQ-Contest] Reasons for ARRL's previously stated policy (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:29:46 -0500
Several posts to the reflector have expressed a lack of understanding of the reasons for the (former?) ARRL policy on publication of logs and disallowance of DXCC credit for those stations who allow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00620.html (8,287 bytes)

196. [CQ-Contest] GA QSO Party Apr 12-12 plans all 159 counties to be QRV (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:08:19 -0400
Hello all: See the attached message if it will to through from NE4S, the GQP manager, reporting that we have commitments for activity from all 159 GA counties for the 2008 GA QSO Party next weekend,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00110.html (10,180 bytes)

197. [CQ-Contest] Last Reminder, GA QSO Party Today and Tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:55:00 -0400
Annual GA QSO Party today 18Z to 04Z Sunday and again 14Z to 24Z on Sunday. Exchange RS(T) and State, Province, "DX," or GA county. We hope to have activity from all 159 counties this year. Many mobi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00167.html (7,466 bytes)

198. [CQ-Contest] FQP Mobile Window (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:41:47 -0400
It appears that, according to the ARRL, the General class band on 40 SSB does indeed extend down to 7175, rathan than to 7200 as I just posted here. Can't imagine any reason for my mistake other than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00410.html (6,714 bytes)

199. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2009 schedule conflict (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 21:25:48 -0400
I think the ARRL and CQ should get togther and use one or both of the split weekends and avoid the conflicts altogether. NAQP RTTY and ARRL DX CW will be totally incompatible after 20Z or so on 40M a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00073.html (7,213 bytes)

200. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2009 schedule conflict (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 08:22:36 -0400
It seems to me the obvious solution is to move CQ 160 SSB and NAQP RTTY to the split weekend of Feb 28-March 1. What say, N2NT for CQ 160 SSB and Shelby, K4WW? Split weekends are usually free of majo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00083.html (7,890 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu