Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:KI9A@aol.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Legal and / or ethical in ARRL? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Thu Mar 7 20:23:54 2002
--part1_f2.17edd0e5.29b96caa_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Anyone besides me have a problem with that? No. Not at all. When you are at home, yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00082.html (8,264 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Spotting (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Fri Mar 8 22:49:19 2002
Hmmmm. So let me get this right. You are now supposed to keep all future operations in a contest secret? You can't tell your fellow club members to get on & make a Q with you, prior to the event?? C'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00101.html (7,346 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:53:51 EDT
Wow.."too complex"?? Are you kidding? I am one of the most computer illiterate people you will ever meet, & have found it VERY easy to navigate. Like everything else, it takes a little effort to READ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00410.html (9,992 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:17:19 EDT
The important point of all this is that we are missing QSLs from stations who took one look at LoTW and gave up because it is unnecessarily complex. Well, Bill, if someone gives up because it is "too
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00429.html (9,141 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:24:12 EDT
Just curious guys, Are we talking about about the exchange of simple QSL's, for a worthless piece of paper (well, other than the cost of the paper & ink), or, are we talking about the US nuclear secr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00557.html (7,878 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:53:51 EDT
Wow.."too complex"?? Are you kidding? I am one of the most computer illiterate people you will ever meet, & have found it VERY easy to navigate. Like everything else, it takes a little effort to READ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00999.html (9,992 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:17:19 EDT
The important point of all this is that we are missing QSLs from stations who took one look at LoTW and gave up because it is unnecessarily complex. Well, Bill, if someone gives up because it is "too
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01018.html (9,141 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:24:12 EDT
Just curious guys, Are we talking about about the exchange of simple QSL's, for a worthless piece of paper (well, other than the cost of the paper & ink), or, are we talking about the US nuclear secr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01146.html (7,878 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:31:20 EST
W6YX has been thanked many times in the past by other stations for increasing their fun in contests by accurately spotting many stations to packet, and has been encouraged to continue to do so in fut
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00246.html (7,735 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best HF rig under $900 (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:10:29 EST
Easy...Icom 746 non-pro, with INRAD filters. 73-Chuck KI9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00250.html (8,546 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] W9NA (ex-W9RQM) SK (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:13:32 EST
This is a sad day for me. While living in the Wausau, WI area in the late 70's & early 80's, Reno was the guy who got me, as a new novice & a 13 year old punk kid, interested in contesting, by lettin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00035.html (7,286 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] FWD: [YCCC] FW: Important Organizational Announcement (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 17:41:14 EST
Nice April Fools joke! 73-Cuck KI9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00033.html (7,323 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:21:54 EST
Take look at page 98 of the 2/04 QST.... More non-contesters wanting to limit us to less than 100kc of 40!! Plus the other bands. This guy is looking for our views on this proposal. Wonder if he also
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00199.html (8,500 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:07:28 EST
Yep-this is why I posted originally. I did email the author, with no response, about "limiting" nets, skeds & ragchewers from operating in the "contest" zone--assuming someone did try to establish a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00267.html (10,503 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Telnet Spotting Network (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:12:37 EST
Maybe, are you willing to start it up & maintain it? ;-) What we need is for the folks who don't wish to view domestic spots to learn how to use the FILTER feature found on the clusters. 'nuff said..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00268.html (8,017 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] 67 spots (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:15:43 EST
How do you figure that? I just went thru all of the rules looking for a section telling me I can't spot a pal of mine, & I sure didn't see any. Can you please point me in the right direction, & don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00428.html (8,420 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:03:36 EST
OK, we went thru this a few years ago with the spotting of club members, it was boring then, & is boring now. But, after thinking a bit, here are real problems that we need to deal with before we get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00431.html (10,067 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:34:38 EST
that won't work...it'll interfere with the PA & IL QSO Parties! ;-) 73-Chuck KI9A -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VH
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00584.html (8,632 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:25:37 EDT
It also needs to be a little (LOT) less complicated for the casual guys to use. 73-Chuck KI9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00183.html (9,795 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:21:08 EDT
Where do you NOT beg for FD QSO's on 10??? I have never had much luck on 10 CW from the midwest, even 25 years ago! I did a small 1E from home, & had a TON of CW QSO's, never a shortage. I have done
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00314.html (8,312 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu